You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "Sanctuary City" , how mathematically immigration will destroy your country.
"weak" ...by saying those who doesn't care about Rome it self. "rebel’s one". There was many issue...but mass immigration was one of the problem I found.
Not mass migration (they are coming from somewhere after all, so it's not only immigration) was the cause for problems, but problems were the cause for mass migration.
People that halfway happy don't go away to far, dangerous lands they don't know in masses.
well, I really have 0 problem for "immigration", but people have to "work for", yes it take time, but it's for the best of "your country". Even, if one day, they say ... hey have a plan, let's go in North ...and build something here. Ok we need 1 millions of migrant. ! millions it's a lot... but they have to pick the one millions from those who "ask" to come. meaby lower the amount of money needed to come here, or be less stickt on others stuff... but eveyone need to go trou a check list. And , don't pick only arab, black people...so they show how "sweet" we are with this culture, and we are not anti-muslm. or ot "raciste". I'm only talking about "Illigale" , I'm not anti-migration at all... when it is done by the rules
It is just strange how the rules change.
200 years ago, you needed permission of your land to leave it.
100 years ago you didn't meed a passport - you could literaly drive with the Orient Express from one end to the other without having to do month of paperwork before.
The highest rule we have btw. is Human Rights, and those include the right for asylum in article 14.