Percival Gull 4 Mk 3 P 1D NZ572 1939 to 1940
Design:
George Parnall
Company:
Percival
Wing Span:
36 ft 2in 11.02 m
Wing Area:
169 sq ft 15.70 sq m
Length:
24 ft 9 in 7.54 m
Height:
7 ft 5 in 2.25 m
Ceiling:
16,000 ft 4,877 m
Speed:
145 MPH 233 kph
Range:
700 Miles 1,126 km
T/O Weight:
2,050 lb 930 kg
Crew:
1 Pilot
2 Passengers
Role:
Light Comms
Total Manufactured:
24
First Flight:
Armament:
Nil
Qty Served:
1
Years Served:
1939 to 1940
Tail No:
NZ 572
ENGINE
Type:
De Havilland Gypsy Major 1
4 cylinder, in line, inverted, air cooled
Bore:
4.646 in 118 mm
Stroke:
5.512 in 140 mm
Volume:
373 cu in 6.124 Lt
T/O HP:
145 HP
T/O RPM:
2,550 RPM
Compression Ratio:
5.2 : 1
Fuel:
73 Octane
Oil:
O M D 370
Length:
48.3 in 1,227 mm
Width:
20 in 508 mm
Height:
29.6 in 752 mm
Weight:
322 lb 146 kg
Power to Weight Ratio:
0.48 hp/lb 0.76 KW/Kg
Notes:
NZ 572
Constructors No.: D 45
Registered G – ACUL
Flown from England to Wigram by Ernie Clark
in 21 days Oct – Nov 1936
Registered ZK – AES 5 Jan 1937
To Air Department, operated as a civilian A/C
With the Aerodrome Branch
Of Public Works Department 12 Aug 1937
Impressed into RNZAF
Cost 1050.00.00 pound [$2100] 12 Aug 1939
Engine failed and the A/C was damaged
Beyond repair in the ensuing forced landing
At Hobsonville 18 Jul 1940
Written off burnt
Flown By:
Comms Flight Rongotai
Photos through the Ohakea Museum
with thanks to son-of-satire for the banner
It's a massive design by George Parnall, thanks for mention him @len.george
Hardly massive, it was a 2 to 3 seater.
Beep! Beep! @shadow3scalpel at your service. I am here to assist all military members on Steemit. This HumVee will be scouting posts from a list of Veterans that is maintained by @chairborne. If you are a Veteran and new to Steemit, and you have questions or want to join the Veterans community, reply to this comment. We got your six, unless you are in the rear with the gear. Ooh-Rah!
Comment by @inthenow. This is a opt-in bot.
Beautiful information friend @len.george
Thank you
excellene post & very good work @len.george
thank you for our kind reply
welcome friend @len.george
thnx for reply/comment me
excelent photography and information @len.george
glad you liked it
And why were they done so little?
In the 1930s the great depression had just finished, nobody had a lot of money.
Flying was a new thrill, not as common as it is today.
A small, simple aeroplane could be looked after by a skilled owner, where a larger one required staff that needed paying, these were the days of 5 to 10 dollars a week to live on.