RE: The History Of Vaccine Series

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The History Of Vaccine Series

iamemir (34)in #history • 7 years ago

@pjcswart if you were reading what I said you would see that i mentioned "it is nice to be suspicious" but that is actually problem of people like you . YOU DON'T READ and that is actually why when people like you post an opinion 99 % of population sort it as unreliable. I believe you have Average or Above average IQ ( steemit is for open minded people) so i strongly suggest you explore and learn science behind vaccines. All anti-vaccine propaganda is not supported by any public reliable medicine magazine

7 years ago in #history by iamemir (34)

Sort:

reddust (71) 7 years ago (edited)

Research who gives advertising money to medical magazines and grants to medical and science journals....It's the vaccine industry. No one wants to bite the hand that feeds it. Also read about the scandals that plague scientific journals regarding faking experiments and review board fraud.

https://www.vox.com/2014/12/7/7344963/scientists-scammed-at-least-110-academic-papers-into-publication

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-39054778

According to a survey published in the journal Nature last summer, more than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist's experiments.

$9.67

9 votes

[-]

truthtrain (56) 7 years ago

Proof?

people always think they have proof drugs/vaccines work because its in a peer reviewed journal, look what happens in some of the best journals > Arguably the most prestigious medical journal in the world, the New England Journal of Medicine regularly features articles over which pharmaceutical companies and their employees can exert significant
influence. Over a year-long period ending in August, NEJM
published 73 articles on original studies of new drugs, encompassing
drugs approved by the FDA since 2000 and experimental drugs, according to a review by The Washington Post. Of those articles, 60 were funded by a pharmaceutical company, 50 were co-written by drug company employees and 37 had a lead author, typically an academic, who had previously accepted outside compensation from the sponsoring drug company in the form of consultant pay, grants or speaker fees. Just when you think you have proof drugs/vaccines work, think again!! http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/as-drug-industrys-influence-over-research-grows-so-does-the-potential-for-bias/2012/11/24/bb64d596-1264-11e2-be82-c3411b7680a9_story.html

$0.37

1 vote

[-]

reddust (71) 7 years ago

Thank you for the additional information @truthtrain. I try and keep things simple when debating. The information from you and others help me so much. Also I don't like to debate people who start off the debate with an insult, usually using their qualifications for being in the know and bringing up the word conspiracy...I don't debate people who start calling names or saying they know more than I do.... it is a waste of my time.