Ante/post diluvian alignments
Antediluvian and post-diluvian alignments
I missed something that should have been a very easy catch in 2012 since it wasn't the thing I was looking for and I didn't take the five minutes to figure it out. That is that you have to view axis tilts as the angle distance from perpendicular to the system plane... Viewed that way, Jupiter and Venus have the same tilt to within less than half a degree. That is hard evidence and has to trump anything you might construct entirely from literature or interpretation of mythology. That says that Velikovsky was absolutely right in claiming that Venus had been ejected from Jupiter and not Saturn.
The new book (The Ganymede Hypothesis) explains what Ev Cochrane and David Talbott have been describing, i.e. that there were both an antediluvian Saturn/Neptune/Mars/Earth alignment (Shamash glyphs) and a post-diluvian Jupiter/Venus/Mars/Earth alignment and that what Cochrane and Talbott have described is the later. Egyptian lore describing Venus as the "eye of Ra" means that Ra was Jupiter and not Saturn.
Most early artist concept drawings related to the Ganymede Hypothesis assume an orbiting system and some show Ganymede as a kind of a hellscape when between Jupiter and the sun. I believe that to be wrong at this point. The sun had to be on one side of the entire thing in order for the xfer of humans and dolphins to work and that says people on Ganymede were seeing a kind of a permanent eclipse, a yellow rim of the sun around Jupiter, but with the center mass of the sun shielded from view so the people did not just bake or fry, and blue skies.
Herbig/Haro strings are generally straight so that the original aproach of the Saturnian system to the Jupiter/sun system was on a straight line, while the second approach in which the Saturn system was captured was on a spiral, the book explains that.
Debates and arguments as to whether the body between Saturn and Mars is Neptune or Venus sometimes involve questions as to the color of Neptune…
The question is irrelevent wrt the question of an origin for Venus since, as I note, Venus and Jupiter having the same axis tilt is decisive in favor of Velikovsky and Jupiter. Nonetheless just for fun, I queried openAI as to Neptune's color and the response was that the color does not seem to be any kind of a NASA invention:
What color is the planet neptune?
ChatGPT
Neptune is often described as a deep blue or azure planet. The blue color is primarily attributed to the presence of methane in its atmosphere. Methane tends to absorb red light and reflects or scatters blue light, giving Neptune its characteristic blue appearance. The exact shade of blue can vary depending on atmospheric conditions and viewing conditions. Keep in mind that the color you see in images of Neptune may also be enhanced or modified for scientific or artistic purposes when captured by spacecraft or telescopes.OpenAI also claims that the Egyptian Shen clasps such as this item:
date from as early as pre-dynastic times, making the earliest of such antediluvian and the blue body almost certainly Neptuna and not Venus. The fact that the blue area almost obscures the golden area of Saturn also argues in favor of the larger body (Neptune) . The Neptune area certainly looks blue enough but, again, the question of color is a red herring and irrelevant to questions of origin.
The Ganymede Hypothesis is a theory of human and solar system origins based on EU concepts.
On Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBZ1RMqjKk8pp_TB_jfeBHQ
On Amazon:
Paperback: https://tinyurl.com/2vbeatuc
Kindle Ebook: https://tinyurl.com/bd3yd56r
On Facebook: