You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: You Can't Be A Vegetarian
I give plenty of references in my post. Not a single one dared to tackle them.
including you. Your opinion means little to me if you can'r even argue the title of the post.
Oh wait, yeah you did, you talked about how plants feel pain like how we do, yet they have no central nervous system or recepter to actually FEEL the pain like animals do.
You also are ABSOLUTELY BLIND to the fact that eating animals causes more plants to be eaten by default, which means no matter what you shouldn't eat animals even if this was true.
Then literally everything else is you justifying saying "well we can't be perfect so why try at all :)"
Beyond that there's nothing to address and you've had your face bashed in repeatably in the comments by vegans with facts, and you still aren't getting it. Like I said, you're not worth my time. You're either faking it for money or actually insane.
it is inevitable. this is what I am saying. do yourself a favor and stop being so willingly thick.
nop. I say, that meat consumption is insignificant to overall carbon footprint. e.g having a child is the biggest source of pollution for the planet.
not a single one brought a single argument. only emotional ones "you are bad because you eat meat"
well, boo hoo.
In other words things die and get hurt so why do anything to contibute less to their suffering :))))
Like I said before, that's some sick demented shit right there you're saying.
It's been proven it's well over 20-30% of human-caused carbon output, how is that insignificant? Insignificant is 1-3% at most.
Regardless, again, you're justifying your misbehavior by blaming other things. It's not hard to ALSO not eat dead animals.
Huh, I saw you reply to people quoting scientific findings and documentaries, did you forget you did that?
they are food. much like people fly planes, use medicine or other products that have animal parts in it, they are part of the human civilization. you are too sensitive to eat meat. fine. just understand. nobody cares.
overall. that is, even the animals we use for other things..check the cow in my post.
documentaries are not arguments..especially when the executive director takes a private jet back and forth across the country to receive a "green" award.
Not even all of those things are true that's mentioned there, at least in general, however regardless they don't kill cows for those materials.
They kill them only for meat or for hide.
Not for some obscure by-product they use in tires or gas.
So because someone does what is logically best to do to get the movie out there and promote it, and thus reduce overall impact, it takes away from the substance of the documentary and the facts?
Wow you'e an idiot.
Again, that's not an argument. You have no argument.
Are sex slaves meant to be raped because...they're for sex?
Are children meant to be beaten because...they're good to get your anger out on?
Sorry but they aren't food, they're living beings.
actually it does because he has been criticized for misrepresenting and overblowing facts he is a hypcrite that craves attention. he cares very little about the environment. in other words, your average attention whoring vegetarian.
here is some research.
https://www.quora.com/How-accurate-is-the-movie-Cowspiracy
wrong parallelism. humans need meat. you might be able not to eat but most need it. raping is a violent action that is not necessary for survival.
no need to be a sensationalist to make a comment. you are hurting yourself
That's not research, that's an opinion with news articles and one or two slightly relevant but not so relevant more scientific-articles.
We need meat because...you cannot control yourself from killing animals and eating their decomposing bodies?
Sorry but everything you say is exactly what we can say.
We hold ourself to our own morals, you do not.
..oh great..more documentaries.