RE: The Cancer Conspiracy And Why Natural Cures Are Repressed.
I don't want to sound insensitive or disrespectful, but I believe you are completely forgetting an important aspect. While there are big companies making huge profits from all kinds or drugs, namely cancer treatments, it's the scientific community and not the CEOs that perform the research, that peer review each others work, that file proposals for clinical trials and for approval from regulating agencies. I can even imagine that some of the member of the scientific community might be corrupted, misguided or ill-intended, but not the entire community. In the end, the scientific method is as transparent and honest as humans can be. I recommend that you read this review on what science has to say about alternative cancer therapies: http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/content/9/1/80.full .
This does not mean that there isn't any benefit in following healthy lifestyles, eating well, exercising, etc... But in the end, virtually everyone is susceptible to developing cancer, only with higher or lower odds. I have met people which led incredibly healthy lifestyles and died of cancer nonetheless. Also, I've met people who take care of themselves very poorly and they seem to be hanging on quite well.
You defend a case for suspecting big industries and the government. I don't argue that you shouldn't. But to trust more on poorly documented, unreplicated and allegedly 100% efficient treatments that are only defended by the same people who profit from them, than on scientifically sound and widely tested treatments... Well, that seems a bit odd to me.
Thank you for your comments but i disagree with your analogy, the scientifically sound tests you refer to are usually financed by the same companies who profit from what ever is being tested, example until relatively recently cigarette manufactures argued that cigarettes were perfectly safe and did not cause cancer, they financed the same scientific tests proving cigarettes don't cause cancer lol.
Until the evidence was overwhelming, they still tried to say otherwise. Now that they have been proven to be peddlers of cancer sticks they have gone to third world countries and continue to sell their products and governments allow them to do so even though the evidence is clear.
When i was growing up many mothers were convinced to take thalidomide to prevent morning sickness fortunately my mother did't take it, but it was tested and supposed to be perfectly safe she said.What horrors that caused to many children, but hey it was scientifically safe.
Also according to the governments own statistics over 100,000 people die from prescription drugs every year do you think those people would agree with you that they were subjected to 100% efficient scientifically proven treatments, i don't think so.
The Rockefeller's supplied mustard gas in the first world war to kill people, afterwards to keep the factories in production the same gas was used in chemotherapy which breaks the immune system down and destroys the good with the bad, people recover usually in spite of the treatment not because of it,most die within 5 years.
Dr Leonard Coldwell see link here
Most doctors diagnosed with cancer won't take the same treatment they have to dish out, incidentally if they prescribe anything not on their prescribed list they get struck off and cannot work, so scientifically proven or not they lose their job if don't subscribe drugs on their list.
No if you research eugenics like i have you will come to the conclusion that agenda 21 is real and the governments who have signed up to agenda 21 are complicit in the depopulation agenda.Wish it wasn't true but it is on the evidence of agenda 21 and when you realize that governments do not always have your best interests at heart you will be under no illusions depopulation is real.
Following the money always gives the true answer. Ever wondered why all the monies taken by cancer charities and still the same answer, chemo therapy. If they found a cure for cancer they would be out of business, do you believe its in their interests to find a cure for cancer? @kevinace