Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated? Flu Shot Actually Caused More Respiratory Infections!
Studies on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated grownups and children have actually been rejected by the US. government for being 'dishonest', but recently scientists in Hong Kong have conducted this important study
The results are shocking, it revealed that individuals who had actually received the influenza vaccine experienced other breathing infections at a rate 5.5 times more than the placebo group.
If you take the seasonal flu vaccine in the hope if will protect you from disease, it might really be doing the opposite, putting you at threat of getting ill by over 5 times which the chances would be without having the vaccine at all. The figure of being 5.5 times more most likely to acquire a respiratory illness originated from a research study published in Medical Infectious Diseases.
The research study is various from previous ones it was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, where the scientists utilized a genuinely non-active placebo (saline solution), as a stand-in for the flu vaccine. Many other vaccine trials have actually used active placebos, which are compounds that actually consist of ingredients used in the vaccines, making the research studies meaningless. A fact which is often not included in the final write-ups.
The study followed the individuals for approximately 272 days. The active influenza vaccine used was Sanofi Pasteur's Vaxigrip. The trial was performed on children aged 6-15 years. 69 were provided Vaxgrip and 46 were given the saline placebo.
With regard to efficiency against influenza, the authors composed:
There was no statistically considerable difference in the danger of verified seasonal influenza infection between receivers of TIV [trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine] or placeboIndicating that flu vaccines actually provided no advantage.
The authors the tried to cover it up by including:
TIV recipients had significantly lower risk of seasonal influenza infection based upon serologic evidenceThe authors here are attempting to suggest that despite the fact that the vaccine recipients suffered as much authentic influenza as those who received the placebo, they still eventually benefited due to "serologic proof". This "serologic evidence" consists of antibodies produced as a result of the vaccine, which is really the requirement approach of figuring out a vaccine's efficiency.
The story worsens when we see the results showing the recipients having 5.5 times more breathing health problem. Here is a breakdown of the outcomes:
< img class="aligncenter wp-image-7315" src="
"alt= "screen-shot-2016-10-21-at-2-04-03-am-300x161" width=" 460 "height= "247"> Despite the fact that the authors attempt to claim otherwise, we can see from the results that there were an overall of 116 influenza cases in the immunized group and 88 in the placebo group, indicating that those who were vaccinated were 5.5 times more most likely to contract a validated breathing disease. There
![](https://steemitimages.com/640x0/http://cdn.complete-health-and-happiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Screen-Shot-2016-10-21-at-2.04.03-AM-300x161.png)
are also other respiratory health problems that individuals were most likely to agreement after being vaccinated against influenza. The chart shows coxsackievirus and echovirus both of which are understood to trigger meningitis, paralysis, liver disease, and heart disorders. It's not that common, but the same thing is also true of poliovirus. It also causes a typically small breathing health problem, however in some unusual cases it can result in much the exact same damage that coxsackievirus and echovirus can.
Ramifications
The ramifications of this research study are rather serious.
The authors recommend:
Receipt of TIV could increase influenza resistance at the cost of minimized immunity to noninfluenza respiratory viruses, by some unidentified biological system. Alternatively, our outcomes could be described by short-lived nonspecific immunity after influenza virus infection, through the cell-mediated response or, more most likely, the natural immune reaction to infection.
Put merely, the act of injecting the body with antigens is most likely harming the cell-mediated immune response, that is the part of the body immune system that secures without the requirement of turning to development of antibodies.
To summarize, this research study has shown:
- Influenza vaccines offer no benefit.
- Influenza vaccines trigger an extremely increased variety of breathing illnesses.
- Influenza vaccines-- and likely other vaccines-- hurt the innate cell-mediated immune action, which results in a considerable boost in contagious disease occurrences.
We are constantly mis-lead as to the dangers of vaccines, the United States's FDA, CDC, and NIH, the UK's NHS, MHRA, and DOH, Australia's ANPHA, and Canada's Health Canada, plus the global WHO and numerous other comparable bodies wish to keep us in the dark.
They use fear to keep the population scared of not immunizing their kids, when the unfortunate reality is that normally these vaccines exist not to safeguard us, however to make money for the pharmaceutical companies that produce them.
-Bel
Your support/upvote/advice is much appreciated!
Thanks again for another great article @ilovechannel365.
By the way I understand the premise of injecting a minuscule amount of a pathogen for the body to fight and builds antibodies or whatever. But why would people allow any pathogen into their body? The skin and other physical structures or mechanisms are there to stop the entering, the immune system as a backup... you do not try to override mother nature. (sorry, uncle of a vaccine victim).
Appreciate that. For why, frankly I am trying research more. Hope I can have something more useful.
Great article,
i personally opt of of seasonal injections, because the injections just weaken your immune system as a whole, i would rather fight of illness on my own(if i can) and come out stronger from it.
Thanks
You say: "Influenza vaccines-- and likely other vaccines-- hurt the innate cell-mediated immune action, which results in a considerable boost in contagious disease occurrences."
I wrote an article 3 weeks ago about that.
https://steemit.com/vaccines/@canadian-coconut/vaccinations-create-the-wrong-type-of-immune-response-th2-vs-th1-cells-and-achieving-immunostasis
Keep up the good articles! People really need to understand the negatives of the flu shot before they rush out and get it every year.
Do you have a link to the full study?