Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated? Flu Shot Actually Caused More Respiratory Infections!

Studies on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated grownups and children have actually been rejected by the US. government for being 'dishonest', but recently scientists in Hong Kong have conducted this important study

. The test was performed on vaccinated vs. unvaccinated subjects in regards to the influenza vaccine. This is most likely the only real research study in recent times in which a genuine placebo was really utilized and compared to the vaccine.

The results are shocking, it revealed that individuals who had actually received the influenza vaccine experienced other breathing infections at a rate 5.5 times more than the placebo group.

If you take the seasonal flu vaccine in the hope if will protect you from disease, it might really be doing the opposite, putting you at threat of getting ill by over 5 times which the chances would be without having the vaccine at all. The figure of being 5.5 times more most likely to acquire a respiratory illness originated from a research study published in Medical Infectious Diseases.

The research study is various from previous ones it was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, where the scientists utilized a genuinely non-active placebo (saline solution), as a stand-in for the flu vaccine. Many other vaccine trials have actually used active placebos, which are compounds that actually consist of ingredients used in the vaccines, making the research studies meaningless. A fact which is often not included in the final write-ups.

The study followed the individuals for approximately 272 days. The active influenza vaccine used was Sanofi Pasteur's Vaxigrip. The trial was performed on children aged 6-15 years. 69 were provided Vaxgrip and 46 were given the saline placebo.

There was no statistically considerable difference in the danger of verified seasonal influenza infection between receivers of TIV [trivalent influenza inactivated vaccine] or placebo

---

---

Indicating that flu vaccines actually provided no advantage.

The authors the tried to cover it up by including:

TIV recipients had significantly lower risk of seasonal influenza infection based upon serologic evidence

The authors here are attempting to suggest that despite the fact that the vaccine recipients suffered as much authentic influenza as those who received the placebo, they still eventually benefited due to "serologic proof". This "serologic evidence" consists of antibodies produced as a result of the vaccine, which is really the requirement approach of figuring out a vaccine's efficiency.

The story worsens when we see the results showing the recipients having 5.5 times more breathing health problem. Here is a breakdown of the outcomes:

< img class="aligncenter wp-image-7315" src=""alt= "screen-shot-2016-10-21-at-2-04-03-am-300x161" width=" 460 "height= "247"> Despite the fact that the authors attempt to claim otherwise, we can see from the results that there were an overall of 116 influenza cases in the immunized group and 88 in the placebo group, indicating that those who were vaccinated were 5.5 times more most likely to contract a validated breathing disease. There

Ramifications

• Influenza vaccines offer no benefit.
• Influenza vaccines trigger an extremely increased variety of breathing illnesses.
• Influenza vaccines-- and likely other vaccines-- hurt the innate cell-mediated immune action, which results in a considerable boost in contagious disease occurrences.

They use fear to keep the population scared of not immunizing their kids, when the unfortunate reality is that normally these vaccines exist not to safeguard us, however to make money for the pharmaceutical companies that produce them.