RE: The Vaccine Holocaust -- VaxXed Tour Photographic Journey
I don't get it...
By the same standard we all work, die at it and pay taxe that we never been given the choice.
We are not to make work something bad because there is risk.
There is risk everywhere. You living is a risk for others by the simple fact you impact others. If you go and play tennis, recognize that the game is rigged, don't blame the physics that affect the ball. I see the relation of authority to state in the way of the "choice" you are looking for.
If the GOVERNMENT make public policies forcing you into something, they have good reasons for it. The cost benefit as been establish. Its the priority of your leaders to balance the book, through the fraud they also put forward. It still need to balance.
If you are looking for the simple philosophical right to now not vaccinate yourself. Its one thing. If you come across a system based on risk assessment and public health... for the damaged ones, many more will avoid damages. Its a numbers game. Now look at this, its slightly out of context but, somewhere down there it connects. Look how robots will soon take the road. I can garantee you that the same calculation will be made for insurance purpose; humans will not be driving anymore as they will be to expensive and far less cost effective. You will look at the stats of humans dying from robots driving. Yet the numbers will have gone drastically down, justifying the death of others.
Did I mention you live in a world of commerce and liabilities?
I am educating people so that they can make an Informed Decision. These vaccine injuries have not been acknowledged by officials, and they have tried their hardest to sweep them under the rugs. Hitler never announced to his people that he was gassing and killing the Jews. He said instead they were being moved somewhere else and treated properly.
The families of the vaccine injured and the injured themselves KNOW that the vaccines have done this. You can't say that the benefits of vaccinating outweigh the risks when the injuries and deaths aren't officially recognized.
If you read some of the other posts on my blog, you will see that the CDC (Centers for Disease Control) have been caught and proven in a Fraud on the MMR/Autism study. A Whistleblower came forward. What the study actually showed, but hid, was that if a child received the MMR vaccine between ages 12-18 months rather than at 3 years or older, they had a 7X increase in Autism. This study CLEARLY showed that the MMR vaccines causes autism at an incredible rate. Yet you are going to believe the fraudulent CDC when they say that the benefits of the MMR outweigh the risk? Are you going to continue to believe all their other vaccine recommendations?
So, it all boils down to who you believe. Do you believe the thousands upon thousands of people now speaking out (largely thanks to the VaxXed movie) and sharing with the world their vaccine injuries and deaths...
or do you believe the fraudulent CDC who assures us that the benefits of vaccines outweigh the risk?
Your choice ... but you SHOULD HAVE THAT CHOICE. And it should be an INFORMED CHOICE. You need to hear the avalanche of personal stories of vaccine injury to be informed. I am showing you the pictures and proof of this holocaust. Do with it what you well.
I still think that the fraud you are speaking of is instilled, not because of bad science but because of greed. And further more, let's consider for instance antibiotic. We know that the science is solid; it works. We know that it may lead to super resistant bacteria. Do you see any flow of investment toward finding new antibiotic that would prevent such terrible consequence of say, a strain of pneumonia that just ravage people and is not responding to standard array of treatment. I don't see anyone panicking about, again from my perspective, much more tangible threat. I see again, a disconnect with what people want, the responsibility they gave away to their leader and the illogical expectation they foster toward these leader being the key to all their problem.
Trying to use the same route they use to make your point will be difficult, and I don't see science supporting you down here in reality, taking in account the difficulties of the past and tremendous dangers of simply getting sick. I concede that I am not qualified to completely understand both side of the argument fully, cause I am not doing bio-toxicology and/or chemistry... But people smarter then me made a better case for then against. By means of understanding virology, there seem to be an implausibility for it to cause autism.
As you say, we do what we will... we do all our own world puzzle.
The science that you are trusting, has never actually done any studies looking at giving multiple vaccines together, or on the entire childhood vaccine schedule. Any studies they have done are only on a single vaccine. One at a time.
So how can you trust something them when they say it is safe if they haven't even attempted to prove it is safe. They are speaking from FAITH and not science.
As to the Autism -- read some of my earlier articles on how the CDC has been caught red-handed, with 10,000 pages of documents to prove it, committing fraud on the MMR/Autism Study. They changed the data to say that there was no link. In fact the real evidence was that if given the MMR vaccine between 12-18 months versus 3 years or older, the children had a 7 times increase in Autism. They never looked at not getting the MMR at any age, so that number could easily be 20X vaccinated with MMR vs not vaccinated with MMR.
Read this article of mine: These 2 TV Doctors were convinced of the CDC Fraud:
https://steemit.com/health/@canadian-coconut/dr-rachael-ross-and-dr-jim-sear-featured-in-vaxxed-movie-dr-rachel-no-longer-vaccinates-both-convinced-of-cdc-autism-fraud