You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: MedicalMonday #2: HPV vaccination - danger or protection?
Thanks for your post!
As I already said studies to any opinion can be found in the internet. The links you posted lead to statements by single men like "A Gardasil researcher says there is no evidence it works", though, the effectiveness, for example, is proven several times in studies with over 10 000 participants. When you follow the sources of these links, not one single reliable statistic is notified.
Of course, I accept your opinion and I know it is scaring to read those kind of articles, but please accept that I, for myself, trust in the studies I refered to and which include scientifically investigated meta-analysis and studies from all over the world and I don't want to start a pro and contra-study battle here.
Good night :)
I will go with nature and nutritional deficiencies
Not drug deficiencies;)
IMO Science is in the wrong hands
Science makes fake claims all
The time , I don't trust drug thugs
And their assumptions
Hypothesis
Theories
Beliefs
Studies
Tests
Observations
Experiments
All of which can be flawed
Thanks :)
My body
My choice
My responsibility
Inject diseases get diseases
Hi @truthtain. Since you think science is based on beliefs and lies, how do you differentiate truth for lies in your own system of beliefs ? What proof or other element is required for you to be convinced of something ?
Ever hear of the Hunza ?
No science
They have nature ;)
Think about it, the Hunza (in Pakistan) and other truly isolated "primitive" peoples who are so healthy they rarely even have names for diseases that we're seeking immunizations for. It's because they don't have much in the way of disease, period. They have no shots, no free clinics and no filled-in vaccination charts... until they start eating "civilized man's" foods. When they start into a diet of processed foods, sugar, and white flour.
Andrew W. Saul
I think we disagree on the definition of science. Science is a method, not a global authority or a group of people. In this sense it's not in the hands of anyone.
The fact that science was once wrong about cigarettes does not mean that it's wrong about everything. Just like any discovery process, scientific knowledge is built by successive iterations. Science never pretended to explain everything instantly.
You cited a lot of different things that all have different types of issues related to them, so let's focus on chemotherapy for example. What's your point about that and what arguments make you think that your version of the story is better than the official one ?
About your second comment, I have never heard of these people but it seems to make sense to me that people who live isolated from the rest of humanity are exposed to less germs. I'm sure south american native civilisations would agree, sadly they are not here anymore to talk about it because they all died when they met the spanish and their traditional medicine didn't save them.
These people like the Carnegie
The AMA history lesson
And drug thugs
Good one
https://thepeopleschemist.com/how-the-ama-hooks-you-on-drugs-harms-your-health-and-hurts-the-earth/
Chemo is indeed toxic but that's on purpose, the goal is to kill cancer cells. Sadly it has terrible side effects but we have nothing better so far. I'm not going to debate with you on everything that you cite, but since you seem convinced that cancer treatments are harmful and inefficient on purpose, tell me what would be your alternative then and explain why you believe it's better.
Nothing better ? Are you serious ?
AgO3 is curing cancer
Seen it
Have the testimonials
Never heard of the Budwig protocol?
IVC ?
Black cumin seed oil ?
So many
Silver Ozone!!
RNA viruses are inhibited by Tetrasilver Tetroxide US Pat 5676977 or US Pat 6485755
Methods of using electron active compounds for managing cancer
US 6485755
Conclusions of IV Tetrasilver Tetroxide Study
Tetrasilver tetroxide is preferably delivered in an IV solution to inhibit undesirable side effects.
Tetrasilver tetroxide administered by IV appears to stop the growth of the breast cancer.
Tetrasilver tetroxide appears to stimulate the normal breast cells and allows them to replace the anaphasic cells in the breast carcinoma.
Tetrasilver tetroxide appears to cure infiltrative breast carcinoma in a 24 day period.
Tetrasilver tetroxide appears to cure ductile carcinoma special type, medular breast carcinoma in a 30 day period.
Tetrasilver tetroxide appears to cure infiltrative lobular breast cancer in a 30 days period.
Although certain patients developed mild cases of hepatomegaly, the liver functioning was not impaired as evidenced by the normal levels of liver function enzymes in the blood stream.
http://www.google.com/patents/US6485755
A single man can make a difference "Tesla"