You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Latest Info on HF 17 (from GitHub) - Date Tentatively Set to Tue, 7 March 2017 16:00:00 UTC (11:00:00 EST)
I can't say I am in favor of most of these... I feel like if we fix the voting power issues it may solve some of the other problems with the site... That and we haven't really had a large enough user base to really find out if the system works as is or not.
Isn't the problem currently that steemit is losing members with same speed that it is gaining them? Most of these new account are probably bots, just to keep numbers pretty and the members leaving actual people with bad taste in their mouth. Steemit had its moment in the spotlight and back then you had tons of posts with this message "Steemit is not pyramid scheme" but if it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it probably is a duck. So not changing things probably isn't an option if Dan Larimer ever wants his name to be associated with something else than failure, though if just getting money was his goal he did succeed. So he probably doesn't care. Good for him.
This is a view widely shared in cryptospace and when steem price reaches that of bitshares I guess we can all start looking forward for his next project. Can't wait to see that.
Just joking Dan ;)