You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Patience with the Hardfork - There Must Be Consensus
Is it an option for the developers to divide the changes in smaller chunks in order to be able to convince more witnesses?
Is it an option for the developers to divide the changes in smaller chunks in order to be able to convince more witnesses?
Everyone wants a closer-to-linear reward curve. There are also some uncontroversial features in HF 17. We should proceed with those.
yes reward curve is the most important imho
Indeed. Once the less controversial features are out of the way, there will be plenty of time to discuss the really tough ones.
There were concerns about several of the changes in the hardfork. The witnesses are planning to continue discussions with Steemit on the best path forward, with the goal of reaching consensus on a set of changes that are right for the community.
Where are those discussions? Github?
The discussions are spread out over a lot of different channels. This post, as well as a few of the other ones about the HF are collecting input from the people in the community. GitHub has a lot of discussion as well. Some of the witnesses have expressed their views directly to Steemit. You are welcome to email Sneak (sneak at steemit.com) if you have anything you want to get to them directly - but they are already hearing from a lot of people, so no need to repeat stuff if it's already been said by other people before.
I really like what you do on the information front, @timcliff. It should be default, intended by all of the actors that all information about Steem could be found at the same place, or at least use the miraculous invention, called hyperlink to point all specific information from one hub.
It requires much work to collect the info and that closes out everyone from the well thought decision.
Voters may think "witnesses know everything better, I just chose some randomly". That's not that true. I found that I was more prepared in some questions than some witnesses, and I know nothing.
I cannot code and so many others. After reading the SWP, my only source of knowledge is accidentally and luckily read some comments from @smooth and @abit, your articles, and reading the chat (sometimes not so) quetly in the witness channel until someone will say me 'GTFO, peasant'.
This open world is f*ing closed.
Steem should be in a comic (OK, I know @mynameisbrian accepted this challenge many times :) ). The whole platform is about sharing information, yet I feel the lack of them every time, in every question, at everyone. Users have big question marks over their heads, or worse, they start to attack and mislead others confidently based on false information or lack of them.
+1 this
Good idea. Piece meal it.