You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Deconstructing Arguments Against Gun Ownership, Part 2
Once again the majority of the argument is an attempt to mislead the public. How about a disclosure as to the anti-anxiety drugs the perpetrator was on that probably account for this behavior that has been categorized by people who knew him as inexplicable? When big pharma is required to disclose the "suicidal thoughts and tendencies" experienced during the clinical trials you know that there had to have been a statistically significant number of people who experienced them.
Any Serenity fans out there can tell you what created the Reavers.
There isn't enough information to draw any conclusions, but it should be obvious that focusing on the tools used in a crime misses the point.
And big pharma's money pays to keep fingers pointed at the tools, be they guns or cars, but never at the highly profitable drugs that might be the underlying cause.
Perhaps I should write a post about how Big Pharma is another example of corporate collusion with the government against the free market, and part of the reason the US medical industry is hardly an example of "free-market failure."
I think you just did. ;-)