Most effective curators
Top curators last week
| N | Curator | SP | Curation rewards | ∑reward/SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @stuffido | 15.065 SP | 0.738 SP | 0.048940 |
| 2 | @ricardo306 | 15.012 SP | 0.589 SP | 0.039243 |
| 3 | @bluelightning | 15.044 SP | 0.571 SP | 0.037969 |
| 4 | @keep2001 | 15.339 SP | 0.514 SP | 0.033476 |
| 5 | @steembe | 98.942 SP | 2.958 SP | 0.029980 |
| 6 | @lovethedrake | 3.231 SP | 0.092 SP | 0.028523 |
| 7 | @ajier39 | 856.495 SP | 1.225 SP | 0.021271 |
| 8 | @toastymagoo | 15.052 SP | 0.297 SP | 0.019717 |
| 9 | @dexterdoggy | 27.708 SP | 0.532 SP | 0.019203 |
| 10 | @awesome-gadgets | 15.064 SP | 0.280 SP | 0.018591 |
| 11 | @ityp | 6.434 SP | 0.119 SP | 0.018461 |
| 12 | @penghuren | 681.539 SP | 12.301 SP | 0.018066 |
| 13 | @blessed-girl | 15.020 SP | 0.268 SP | 0.017857 |
| 14 | @steem-network | 15.045 SP | 0.254 SP | 0.016887 |
| 15 | @abandi | 15.052 SP | 0.254 SP | 0.016879 |
| 16 | @astur | 15.018 SP | 0.244 SP | 0.016251 |
| 17 | @poopnow | 4.064 SP | 0.064 SP | 0.015756 |
| 18 | @l01 | 3.204 SP | 0.048 SP | 0.014987 |
| 19 | @ruil | 15.076 SP | 0.225 SP | 0.014928 |
| 20 | @snooky | 12.019 SP | 0.175 SP | 0.014568 |
| 21 | @mcclure | 15.064 SP | 0.218 SP | 0.014477 |
| 22 | @lordofreward | 15.010 SP | 0.215 SP | 0.014326 |
| 23 | @best-strategy | 15.050 SP | 0.215 SP | 0.014288 |
| 24 | @l8r | 5.661 SP | 0.079 SP | 0.013966 |
| 25 | @umich | 309.668 SP | 4.286 SP | 0.013821 |
| 26 | @ipaulo | 15.052 SP | 0.208 SP | 0.013821 |
| 27 | @sofia-darling | 27.568 SP | 0.375 SP | 0.013606 |
| 28 | @smelly | 3.248 SP | 0.044 SP | 0.013555 |
| 29 | @ztz | 15.052 SP | 0.202 SP | 0.013427 |
| 30 | @ithinkso | 3.251 SP | 0.042 SP | 0.012932 |
| 31 | @mbot | 15.092 SP | 0.191 SP | 0.012658 |
| 32 | @michael44 | 15.010 SP | 0.188 SP | 0.012527 |
| 33 | @curx | 917.769 SP | 11.472 SP | 0.012495 |
| 34 | @steiller | 15.070 SP | 0.188 SP | 0.012477 |
| 35 | @servokot | 15.061 SP | 0.185 SP | 0.012285 |
| 36 | @dna-with-greg | 31.479 SP | 0.386 SP | 0.012266 |
| 37 | @petrm | 15.013 SP | 0.184 SP | 0.012259 |
| 38 | @paidforwinrar | 15.015 SP | 0.177 SP | 0.011791 |
| 39 | @theotherglens | 3.132 SP | 0.036 SP | 0.011498 |
| 40 | @josephace135 | 567.881 SP | 6.505 SP | 0.011463 |
| 41 | @arv1 | 98.293 SP | 1.107 SP | 0.011265 |
| 42 | @bukfast | 17.080 SP | 0.181 SP | 0.011074 |
| 43 | @corneliagrimsmo | 15.051 SP | 0.166 SP | 0.011002 |
| 44 | @sp33dygonzales | 15.010 SP | 0.160 SP | 0.010661 |
| 45 | @crashdavis | 10.076 SP | 0.107 SP | 0.010623 |
| 46 | @pommer | 15.010 SP | 0.159 SP | 0.010595 |
| 47 | @yeee | 15.019 SP | 0.158 SP | 0.010524 |
| 48 | @gierit | 15.010 SP | 0.157 SP | 0.010461 |
| 49 | @jester87 | 15.010 SP | 0.156 SP | 0.010395 |
| 50 | @hasitpbhatt | 15.039 SP | 0.155 SP | 0.010308 |
| 51 | @mervanite | 3.199 SP | 0.032 SP | 0.010001 |
| 52 | @elondust | 37.147 SP | 0.369 SP | 0.009946 |
| 53 | @zapncrap | 911.743 SP | 9.001 SP | 0.009865 |
| 54 | @maryblaine | 20.193 SP | 0.197 SP | 0.009751 |
| 55 | @isabelll | 15.013 SP | 0.146 SP | 0.009728 |
| 56 | @apt-get | 15.011 SP | 0.142 SP | 0.009462 |
| 57 | @sofia-legacy | 29.078 SP | 0.273 SP | 0.009390 |
| 58 | @seb3364 | 15.013 SP | 0.140 SP | 0.009327 |
| 59 | @zoeyjones | 46.759 SP | 0.433 SP | 0.009267 |
| 60 | @schmozzle | 10.736 SP | 0.099 SP | 0.009215 |
| 61 | @miggel | 15.011 SP | 0.137 SP | 0.009128 |
| 62 | @oboy | 3.292 SP | 0.030 SP | 0.009114 |
| 63 | @mee6 | 1609.120 SP | 14.461 SP | 0.008983 |
| 64 | @bajaro | 15.011 SP | 0.134 SP | 0.008929 |
| 65 | @glassford | 3.754 SP | 0.033 SP | 0.008831 |
| 66 | @ferflo | 15.077 SP | 0.132 SP | 0.008757 |
| 67 | @shenkie | 221.726 SP | 1.935 SP | 0.008729 |
| 68 | @yve1378 | 41.267 SP | 0.360 SP | 0.008724 |
| 69 | @tatylayla | 15.039 SP | 0.131 SP | 0.008712 |
| 70 | @bobzone | 120.354 SP | 1.027 SP | 0.008574 |
| 71 | @leir | 84.737 SP | 0.724 SP | 0.008543 |
| 72 | @nooo | 15.042 SP | 0.128 SP | 0.008512 |
| 73 | @nafestw | 323.755 SP | 2.675 SP | 0.008420 |
| 74 | @noproblemjules | 24.449 SP | 0.205 SP | 0.008391 |
| 75 | @otherglens | 78.649 SP | 0.656 SP | 0.008346 |
| 76 | @joshi110 | 15.013 SP | 0.125 SP | 0.008328 |
| 77 | @algo.coder | 235.738 SP | 1.953 SP | 0.008289 |
| 78 | @zea | 24.322 SP | 0.196 SP | 0.008061 |
| 79 | @dolleyb | 15.013 SP | 0.120 SP | 0.007995 |
| 80 | @salmanphoto | 15.059 SP | 0.120 SP | 0.007965 |
| 81 | @sjennifer | 15.013 SP | 0.119 SP | 0.007929 |
| 82 | @saiyajin | 15.011 SP | 0.116 SP | 0.007729 |
| 83 | @trendingbot | 63.213 SP | 0.481 SP | 0.007610 |
| 84 | @rii | 15.011 SP | 0.114 SP | 0.007596 |
| 85 | @stylo | 813.909 SP | 6.146 SP | 0.007557 |
| 86 | @marketstack | 14446.940 SP | 105.813 SP | 0.007508 |
| 87 | @crypto-econom1st | 68.723 SP | 0.514 SP | 0.007497 |
| 88 | @kleinheim | 15.013 SP | 0.112 SP | 0.007462 |
| 89 | @selise | 15.014 SP | 0.111 SP | 0.007395 |
| 90 | @no0o | 15.013 SP | 0.111 SP | 0.007395 |
| 91 | @opaulo | 11715.105 SP | 85.243 SP | 0.007287 |
| 92 | @mruniverse | 15.056 SP | 0.109 SP | 0.007245 |
| 93 | @walker5 | 15.011 SP | 0.108 SP | 0.007196 |
| 94 | @meher04 | 15.025 SP | 0.108 SP | 0.007192 |
| 95 | @no0 | 14.898 SP | 0.107 SP | 0.007182 |
| 96 | @kaniz | 15.071 SP | 0.105 SP | 0.006960 |
| 97 | @edm0nd24 | 15.011 SP | 0.104 SP | 0.006930 |
| 98 | @vvvvv | 15.011 SP | 0.104 SP | 0.006930 |
| 99 | @milliet | 15.037 SP | 0.104 SP | 0.006912 |
| 100 | @gobigorgohome | 15.011 SP | 0.102 SP | 0.006797 |
Have you tried following the curation trail of one or more of the top curators?
It would be interesting, how much curation reward you can get, if you vote after them.
I tried Streemian and Steemauto to follow the curation trail.
But both services require the followed account allows to follow him.
Is there another (free) service or an python script which can do the job?
Then I'll try and report back.
Yes, there is an another account @gsaw, which repeats votes of this top. It checks, how much points collected by the top voted post. At the moment, it is just the count of top curators voted for that post. If more then one voted, or one of 3 from top, then @gsaw repeats the vote. With vote weight x 3. Then sleeps, until vote power restores. There already some accounts follow gsaw's votes. But I think this just disturb the top, because it increases curatition rewards for the top curators, and they will stay top curators, because these are top curators. :)
I am about to add more metrics. I will collect additionaly statistics of top authors and may be tags, in order to make better predictions, which post, will yeld more return.
Sounds interesting.
But till now @gsaw didn't make it to the top 100 curators.
Do you have any idea what strategy the top accounts here are following?
Seems like I'm stuck around place 30. - 60.
And you should check your calculations for ajier39 (place number 7).
They don't seem right.
You can read some of my old posts about curation strategies.
And if you have any questions you can ask me.
I also thought about starting a curation trail. But if you checked my posts you will now why everyone behind me gets very less curation then the one on top of a trail.
What is this "curation league" you are talking about in your posts? Or do you just mean the list by @gropox?
First I thought about following a curation trail, but now my upvote strategy really improved. I'm pretty much doing the strategy from your post "About my 3rd victory in the curation league (part 3)"
You mentioned a strategy with upvoting post tagged with "utopian.io" and "dmania". Here you are betting on an upvote from the @utopian-io or @dmania accounts, right? Or did you recognize a pattern, posts with the tags utopian-io and dmania usually get a higher payout?
https://steemit.com/engagement/@abh12345/4pswn7-the-curation-and-engagement-leagues-sponsored-by-carlgnash-and-paulag
And utopian and dmania is indeed betting. Cause I can't be certain upfront that the post week get a huge upvote.
Just for about 2 weeks, I restarted the script, and for 1 week there was a lapse, 2 days the script didn't work. Hoppefully it will getting better :)
I'm still working on it.
@ajier39 seems to be OK. The script records SP of each voting user, and in the table is shown the average SP amount last 7 days. Therefore, if a user had some delegated SP and then the delegation was revoked, then SP in the table will decrease slowly.