You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Satoshi Nakamoto Funding MimbleWimble Devs
I'm a little confused about the question.
What kind of community would we create in response to things launching?
I can tell you that my community building skills are about a zero out of ten.
I see myself more as a brainstormer and a programmer.
At the same time, I try to surround myself with people of complimentary skills so, who knows.
The community and SMT features. I was thinking of putting together a crypto community. You would be an asset.
I would only engage in utility tokens that have a clear plan for adding valuable governance features. Personally I think that dapps should start out as controlled by a centralized entity; A lone developer or a small group of developers. They make all the decisions.
Then as time goes on a token must be created to scale up and essentially sell the project to the community using it. Or perhaps more accurately the community would be paid to continue developing and securing the project.
I think most tokens that get created are redundant and unnecessary cash-grabs. We should be focused more on merging existing communities together than on forking out and diluting our value creation. The more people we can get to agree on a set of rules (consensus) the better.
I tried to explain this stance in my Diamond Development post last year.
So many forks and no merges... sad.
I'm certainly open and interested in discussing this more in depth.
Do you have anything specific in mind?
Nope, just thinking out loud and hoping to get a group of like minded crypto enthusiasts together. :) It's all very abstract at the moment, not conceptualized much at all. We are likely a ways off from being able to do much of anything anyways.
Sounds good, I'll keep an open mind.