You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Where did the "keep SourceFinder" voters make their magnitudes?
Thank you for your comment. To rephrase: our aim is to highlight the dichotomy of a democratic voting process, where:
- the vote is about de-listing a project delivering unfair magnitudes
- some are voting against the de-listing with the unfairly acquired magnitudes
Displaying public information makes it accessible. There is no point in contributing to an immutable public ledger if we are going to shun people for making use of these features.
Just because you think this would be unfair acquired mag doesn't mean that it's the case. Everyone had the chance to crunch the sourcefinder workunits, if more people had done so the mag would be more split, thats right.
Right now sourcefinder is contributing 130 to my Mag, and this also wasn't easy as there were several problems with the workunits.
Still i would vote for delist sourcefinder (let's wait for the greylist proposal).
But your attitude and this post really make me want to vote against the delisting.
You are not even comparing this with those sourcefinder crunchers who vote for the delisting, you are not comparing it with anything.
All you do is pointing out some individuals for their choice in a democratic process, because it's different from your choice.
You also didn't do this for accessability, all this data is EASY accessible on gridcoinstats.eu.
So yes, this is a witchhunting post and it should be flagged.
It is in the nature of a functioning democracy to advocate one's own belief. The merit of the belief is to be determined by the public.
By flagging our post you aim to hinder others from reading it. We hope that the irony of your last sentence is not lost on the readers.
Just read the Steemit FAQ, flagging is just a downvote. Your post will only become invisible if a lot more people think it's bad content.
I'm also not really surprised by this post of yours, after your last idea was to buy votes for the delist Moo proposal.