That 'standard' broke down completely after a proposed Tweet which had 2 upvotes & hadn't been posted due to inactivity was then downvoted and rejected.

By YOU. YOU broke the standard that had worked for months. If you're going to be dismissive, at least tell the truth.

Technically since there is no legal Gridcoin entity there's not one 'Official' representative for Gridcoin, it may be appropriate for all parties to drop the use of 'Official' terminology.

Perhaps you should take a look at the twitter you currently manage then....

Regarding the recent polls, their fate wasn't decided by a few whales - there was support of these 'monetized' platforms by many smaller users.

Even a cursory glance at the poll votes reveals this to be false. Two voters controlled almost half the vote.

This wasn't why his Twitter access was revoked, don't rewrite history with false narratives.

Would you care to elaborate on the actual reason then? Or is that classified?

Don't disregard the will of the people as interpreted from the Gridcoin blockchain, closed groups are not superior.

So then why does the private Ops channel, whose member list is kept secret still exist? Let's embrace the "will of the people".

I fundamentally disagree, closed group polls exclude the majority of the Gridcoin community who aught to have an input given that your actions affect their holdings.

Again, why does this not apply to ops?