The "fake" statement by Jacques Attali foreshadowed our reality today?

It has once again come to the attention of many people who criticize the global “Pandemic” and Klaus Schwab’s 'Great Reset' that Jacques Attali allegedly gave an interview in 1983 allegedly including this outrageous statement:

"The future will be about finding a way to reduce the population … of course, we will not be able to execute people or build camps. We get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good… we will find or cause something, a pandemic targeting certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus affecting the old or the elderly, it doesn’t matter, the weak and the fearful will succumb to it. The stupid will believe in it and ask to be treated. We will have taken care of having planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution. The selection of idiots will therefore be done by itself. They will go to the slaughterhouse alone."

Google this and you can only find denials that Attali said this. To me the text does seem far too extreme and open and far too conveniently anticipatory of today’s global controversy and today’s widespread suspicions that “depopulation” is the purpose of the Pfizer/Moderna “vaccines”. This persuades me that this alleged statement is a fake.

But the campaign to impose total global dictatorship is very real. That concentration camps are being built in the UK and Australia at least is incontrovertible fact. The purported Attali statement of 1983 is fake but not much that is in this statement is fake in 2021. Somebody is trying to fool us. Who could that someone be?

I always insist on this point: one must be aware that the CIA has been working tirelessly since its inception in 1947 to have a determining influence in all public media. Already in the 1950s the phrase "Wizner's Wurlitzer” was a CIA inside joke; CIA co-founder Frank Wizner was in charge of gaining covert influence in US media and the joke was that already by 1960 the CIA could play US public opinion like a mechanical piano. I invite you to imagine how much greater CIA penetration into all media, traditional and digital, is today.

As regards the issue of this alleged statement by Attali: The effect of publishing this statement is to tempt dissidents to believe it and then when the statement is proven false those who believed it are discredited and with them the ENTIRE ISSUE IS DISCREDITED. This is a classic CIA tactic.

My prime example comes from the Bush/Kerry presidential contest in 2004. Dan Rather was evening news anchor for ABC News then. ABC was sent a document allegedly "leaked" from the Texas Air National Guard proving that George W Bush went AWOL for a year during the Vietnam War to avoid overseas service. The document was accepted as genuine and so Rather endorsed it on ABC News. Those who supported Kerry, a real veteran of the Vietnam War, were very excited over this document. Immediately the document was exposed as a forgery, Kerry was discredited and Dan Rather's career was ruined. This scandal helped grease Bush's ride back into the White House and the entire issue of his war service was buried forever. The kicker is this: Bush really did go AWOL for a year from the TANG; and remember that his daddy George H W “Poppy” Bush was “former” head of the CIA. This is a great example of the old CIA bait and switch.

I'm sure I could specify others over the years. Take the issue of UFOs. There have been many rumours and one extremely good fake video over the years that smelled like the CIA Bait and Switch. Unnamed generals have said the US military has Alien tech to “take ET home” and even a whole secret fleet of starships. Those who believe these rumours are easily discredited; this routine serves to maintain the US military's lie that there are no UFOs.

Years ago a film was made public purporting to be a 1947 film of the autopsy of a dead Alien at Roswell. After letting the Ufology community get excited over this film the hoax was revealed. Stan Winston revealed that he had lied when he promoted the film as genuine and actually his studio had made the film.

My take on it was that the amount of money put into making this film seem genuine and the seamless appearance of it was suspicious in itself. For one thing, Stan Winston used genuine unused film from 1947 to make his fake (or WAS it a fake?). Why in the world would he, or rather his employers, do that unless they wanted not just the general public but even diligent Ufologists to be deceived? Another suspicious indication was that the people who paid Stan Winston the very considerable money to make the film remained anonymous. The very sneaky Mr Anonymous has always been my favourite CIA mouthpiece.

I suspected that there was in circulation a genuine film and NASA hired the CIA to find it, destroy it, or discredit it. The perfect way to do that is make a fake film that looked exactly like the real film and then expose it as fake. That way it wouldn't matter that there was a real film because anyone who put the real film forward would be ridiculed as a faker. The whole issue was thus buried for good.

Wise up, kids. Always consider the political consequences of items in the media because that’s a clue to the motivation behind them and to those who have that motivation. The question is always “Who benefits from this?”. Modus Operandi identifies the perpetrator of any crime.

In this case what is the effect of believing that the Attali statement is real? That makes you feel more afraid and more helpless. And what happens when the item is exposed as fake? You believers become branded as fools and fakers; you even brand yourselves as fools and from then on you are immobilized by doubt.

But the kicker is this: it doesn’t matter whether Attali said it or not, there are concentration camps being constructed and the fact of hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people being injured, disabled and even killed by the so-called C-19 “vaccinations” is perfectly open to the public via VAERS and the European Medicines Agency.