I am god....can you prove the argument wrong?
We must start from the beginning.
This universe is a simulation
How? Why?
Well basically the argument goes like this, we have found a way for (approaching but basically) infinite processing power in quantum mechanics. ( it is possible to simulate a quantum computer using a quantum computer. However, the simulated one can be stronger than the non-simulated one due to superpositions. Look it up it's really cool.) if it is not really possible and this is just a glitch we are in a simulation, if not we are still in one.
Because infinite processing power exists if one simulation with it is made an infinite amount of universes can be made. This means it is infinity to one we are in a simulation.
At least every infinite set of simulations will have another set of infinite simulations run in it.
Why is this important?
if we are in an infinite set of infinite simulations. Due to the nature of infinity infinite lower levels will manage to convince a higher level to run it again but with them not instantly (so they can interact). This means it has reached the next level of simulation.
ok cool have you started your argument yet?
no hold on be patient.
The infinite versions of the one who went to a higher level will have an infinite amount who gain control of the higher level. Due to infinity an infinite versions of me do this (who would all have absolute power over the universe they came from). Due to infinity an infinite amount of me go and bring all other versions of myself along to the upper level. This means that due to infinity there is a 50% chance that they bring me each level. They will not stop at one level above and will go up bringing all new that they have now gained access to from below.
With infinite levels it is 1-(1/2)^ infinity that this will not be done to me.
or i could be a selfish prick in all versions tbh
also source for the pic
its in public domain
pixabay.com/static/uploads/photo/2016/07/13/09/38/elephant-headed-god-1514009_960_720.png
No really prove it wrong don't just upvote it lmao
You need to prove it right. Not the other way around.
why?
@anarchyhasnogods If you need to ask that then you don't understand the basis for your own argument.
Also wow, not sure what you're smoking but sounds like some good stuff.
Give me a few minutes I'll tear this fallacy down for you.
what? i just asked you why i need to prove it right
"what? i just asked you why i need to prove it right"
Because burden of proof bro. Burden of proof lies on the one making the claim.
ok do i need to prove it? i said prove it wrong if you can i simply do not care if it is true or not it was a challenge
Love the post... image url at end needs fixing but great
what? the http part automattically makes it an image so i have to leave it off
I see what you were doing, sorry I didn't catch on lol
Hey man, could you give me a reason why you flagged my post?
The south lost the war the all flags are meaningless and both liberals and conservatives at this point don't listen to logic of the other side. At this point it is appealing to your own side for monetary value this is for social networking and posts like that can easily rip the community apart lmao I think we all want one solid community not warring factions
If I downvote your post it would likely result in less downvotes for both sides including you in the future
Right on man, but my whole point in the post was that flags are meaningless. Did you read it?
I read most of it the problem is flags may in reality be meaningless but so is everything else peoples emotional reactions to everything decide what it is to humanity.
My intent was to raise awareness of tools used by the state to keep people distracted. Any hope of monetary achievement is nothing more to me than an unlikely benefit. I don't appreciate you making that assumption , however I appreciate you responding to me.. So thank you for that