The Future Organization is a Porous Organization

in #futurology8 years ago (edited)

Months ago, I wrote an article here about the platform being a porous organisation that could also hosts similar sub-orgs. Found an article today, which may help with understanding Curie's current transformation.

Basically a porous organisation that maximises a kind of creator / curator culture. Looking at the current protoype, Curie seems like it will be able to accommodate both diligent "post-hunters" and casual "eureka-finders" with its mix of Curation Score and Approval Rating.

So did Curie evolved by design, or by the insights / emergent qualities gained from experiencing / running a guild on the STEEM blockchain? No idea, but porous organizations might be the best kind of arrangement to evolve over time. Contributory walk-in, walk-out culture - well, that's just part of my persistence on the future of work. Imagine if there are thousands of these porous organizations, in which people are free to participate in good chunks of them for their own best interests at any moment in time.

Below are the highlights taken from: http://markbritz.com/the-future-organization-is-a-porous-organization/ (Thanks for the post title too)

Trust is the bedrock of collaborative and cooperative work which quite frankly is the future of work (well, work that won’t be automated anyway). Today we know trust is developed over a long period of time and even then it’s with a select and small subset of people in an organization.

I think one practice organizations can take to build organization-wide trust is to support and encourage Working Out Loud (WOL). If work is done in the open (not just status updates and summary posts) in collaborative spaces and with opportunities for critique and contribution from all levels, it creates an environment for honestly, altruism and transparency.

Talent can now be found anywhere, investing heavily in inane engagement activities to retain talent makes little sense. For organizations the smarter move is to put greater emphasis again on capturing the inertia of the pass-through employee, in other words their residue. Organizations now need to focus more on creating an ecosystem suited for capturing and tagging contributions in a form that they can easily be discovered, used and built upon. This is the grease that lubricates the perpetual motion needs of today’s organizations.


This is just my take on the matter. Image source here. If you missed Curie's recent post on its first major prototype for open-participation - check it out here


Sort:  

I really LOL when I read the WOL acronym.

More seriously, this sounds very logical. Open access and evolution are the keys, as always :)

Do you think the realm of science/deep research could tap into such an organization? Or is it already happening to some degree? Other than distributed computing projects.. well since you said open-access, I guess that's been happening already

This post has been ranked within the top 10 most undervalued posts in the first half of Feb 07. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $12.96 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Feb 07 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 56386.16
ETH 2529.81
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.49