You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: "A day in the future": interviewing the creator of the Neuralphone
People who think it would be great to have this neural-interface with a computer are those who believe computers can be superior to the mind.
Well computers can be faster than our minds when it comes to calculations mate, that is for sure.
is that they are not good tools.
Do you think a computer is not a good tool?
I believe our current computers, microsloth and android are horrible tools.
Your cell phone belongs to the service provider, the manufacturer, law enforcement, the state, and advertisers. You are only allowed to use it. (as long as it doesn't conflict with any of the other priorities)
Computers seem faster when you look at stuff like arithmetic.
However, there are people who, only using their mind, are faster.
We get out of the area of math, and the computer falls behind.
Boogle is having trouble indexing just 3% of the current internet.
So, basically, all i see with the computer-human interface, is just a dream of being able to search for information faster and being on-line all the time.
There are people that somehow can make very fast calculations indeed, but they wouldn't be able to keep up with the speed we can achieve using computers.
Is there someone or something doing a better job at it?
The thing is, our whole reality is based on math. That's why there are equations that can explain a lot of the phenomenons.
And it will be even more apparent when we fix mathematics (or, i should say calibrate it)
and start using a base 12 numerical system. Then things align, and we will easily start seeing the pattern that is the universe.
wow mate that sounds a far fetched, when do you think that can happen?
Well, the materialist scientists made up this messed up measuring system called "metric".
The meter is based on how far light travels in a given time, but the speed of light was defined (not measured) as a certain amount of meters. Yes, it is circular, and it is in the text books, but very few people ever put it together.
So, there are all kinds of websites that talk about base 12 mathematics and just how much better it is.
Like, imagine that the universe comes in dozens. And so it is so much easier to count 1 dozen, 2 dozen... instead of 12, 24, 36...
The information is out there, and has been out there... so, i do not know when it will take center stage. Its like scientists are saying "we are ok with VHS, thanks" while others having been using DVDs for a while.
But it mostly has to do with how sciences are taught. You repeat the correct thing, you get an A, you are good. And so, most scientists won't ever question it. Won't ever go outside the box.
It will happen, science will switch to base 12. But, i do not know when.