You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Buy Steem, Power Up, Upvote Yourself, WIN!!!
@ranchorelaxo uses 100% of his voting power to reward @haejin.
I'd be more than happy to counteract him with you. But, it seems like you've been contaminated by his infectious greed. YOU are the hyprocrite. Also, your flagging and demeanor has been nothing but toxicity lately. Either I flag you, or him. I'm done letting these problems fester.
Haha. I read this whole convo.. And i have to say its a bit entertaining in a dark kind of way.
But what do you guys think is going to happen? Youre whales. One of you is going to scare away the other from STEEM by flagging back and forth? Cmon. It all ends the same way, people get tired and let it go. So why not let it go right now?
Wasting so much time and power insulting and bickering is beyond pointless.
You can call each other what ever names you want but the truth of the matter is that the "people"
we need all you fuckers here.
;)
This is where "with great power comes great responsibility" comes in...
I have 6K SP. Nice whale lol
I have Gina. 😉 I get comments of who commented even if you delete it.
Now, that is just a mistake but the simple fact you control one of the biggest accounts on the blockchain shows your importance to the platform.
A prime minister might have a monthly paycheck of 2000 dollars, i know mine has, but controling something of immense importance offsets his thin wallet. Youre such a guy. So dont sell yourself short.
Youre as big as a fat whale account here.
Who is Gina?
I'm not using DTube's delegation because it's not mine, it belongs to the curation team and community. I don't think they would agree on me downvoting this shit content so even if I deeply want to do it, I won't.
Berny and Marky use their full stake to strike against my 6K SP whenever I say something they don't like, and they just downvote all my 7 days old or less comments, because it's funny to them. They want me to stop telling the truth in comments.
They are just exploiters/abusers/greedy however you want to call it, and as a community leader on steem it's my role to defend the people who get scammed by these people.
You missed my point. Youre as big here as any of them. Your 6k SP doesnt mean anything.
Your influence here is as big as theirs. You control a 2mil account. Your importance to the platform is equal or greater then theirs.
Whos doing what, when and why is unimportant. You cant affect it with bickering and fighting. You can only make it worse.
I dont get you guys, really. Getting ahead is easy for you. You have a position, people respect you and you guys instead of working through the differences and benefiting from it, you fight.
If you told me i was a turd and a abuser id tell you to go to hell. Well i wouldnt but if i had a million SP i would.
All this shit is fake. From the minnow scraping up pennies to the whales up top.
Those in the middle fakest of all.
You guys dont need to be, but you act like this when you can work together ffs. You dont need to agree with all they do nor do they have to agree with what you do but a common ground exists and focusing on that can lead to everyone prospering.
Its not:
Its about understanding the other guy and finding a common ground to build upon so everyone in question prospers.
"But if they continue like this we will all lose."
Thats bulshit. Thats Jerry talk. Minnows or whatever i am inbetween, are scraping the trash cans for a few half eaten steaks and you guys are here fighting about how is a bigger dick between yourselves.
You guys need to take your egos and shove it in a box and beat it with a shovel when it pops up.
Fulltimegeek supports so many accounts, Bernie as well, you fucking run Dtube of all things,Mark flags spammers and abusers all day long...
And you guys are here flagging each other? What in the fuck!?
Focus on the things you agree on is all im saying. No two people have the exact same values.
If anything, from what I've seen, flagging @haejin just polarized the community and made him king of the rep on the platform. Of course I know these numbers don't mean squat, but I'm reluctant to flag anything because of what value I think something is because that's largely subjective and I think it violates voluntarist principles (use of force to impose your values onto others) and creates a negative atmosphere.
Well haejin got his rep more or less completely from rancho and his 1M SP. If you would create 10 posts per day and have 1M SP to upvote this posts you would push your rep veeeery high xD
I may be wrong but I think at least 90% of his rewards were created by ranchos votes.
Posted using Partiko Android
I may be wrong to, but my guess would be 98+%, @dera123
Posted using Partiko Android
Haha you're right xD
Posted using Partiko Android
I think the platform would be better off not focusing on the egos and avoiding the use of the downvote. We shouldn't be trying to drag @haejin down. We should be trying to lift others up.
I feel the same way about flagging people. It's a good way to divert the reward pool to plankton. If the whales flag each other, maybe more can be spread to the rest of us. I dislike the quality of myself of enjoying watching these guys fight online. It's a quality that is as bad as envy.
I clicked though. Here I am reading the drama. Oh well, at least I am not looking at their wallets and feeling envy. Pick your poison.
It's not against voluntarist principles because this is a DAC. Your shares are property ownership. You therefore have the right and duty to express your subjective opinion of a post's value. The goal is to increase the value and profit gained from your property (the blockchain). If you are paying for a service (blogging), you have a right to say someone's wages are higher than the value they provide. Once delegation and professional curation is worked out we'll see a lot less bullshit I'm sure, but flagging is a necessary part of post appraisal.