RE: WHY IS STEEM FAILING? BECAUSE YOU ALL BITCH AND WHINE ABOUT SELF-VOTING.
Bigger rewards while the price crashes because everyone sees it as a pay yourself scheme not much different than all other ponzi schemes? Buying steem just to vote on yourself is hinged on the end goal, which is to eventually cash out and return a profit, correct? If steem did not have curation rewards then this platform would have imploded long ago as surely no one would have invested, as you observed, simply to give others rewards. The same for downvoting, without it, this place would have become a prisoner dilemma in no time, where despite the curation rewards no one would risk voting for anyone else. The only way for this platform to succeed is by utilizing the mechanisms to encourage others to power up what they are rewarded and to invest by buying steem. If everyone were simply paying themselves, surely you can see that it wouldn't be sustainable, much like if everyone only voted for themselves, because none of that encourages anyone to power up or to invest. That's why the proposal is in place, that's why downvoting exists, that's why curation rewards are so important.
you are just wrong, no matter what you do with your click the coins will eventually get cashed out by somebody, cause thats the game btw it's called make money and imagine bitcoin changing there white paper shit to say well next week were gonna have 42 million coins , what do you think be the investors reaction would be. The whales are not only to lazy to be good authors most are not and even more lazy to curate they really want money for doing nothing this is really not good cause reduced authors rewards will mean less content , less content means less user engagement But you seem to THINK you know it all but just dont know how to count LOL :)))
50% is less than 75%
Sure retard, there will be less content because people weren't here when the price went to six cents. You think the whales are evil/lazy, why the fuck are you here then?
imagine what my two bitcoins would have gotten me then hmm every time they play with the voting nothing gets achieved and the coin gets dumped you wanna know why i tell you why because in the boardroom meetings all over this planet of the really big firms they hear dissension bad stuff reviews anger down voting with so much choice you wanna put your money there. please stop looking back you can't see where your going.
"every time they play with voting nothing gets achieved".
In other words, you're completely OK with the incredible disfunction. Also, the curation rewards have been the same almost from inception. You act as if they're idiots "playing" with it, instead of having a clue at all, but you couldn't say shit about the fact that 75% is coming from 20% and ever shrinking organic curation.
You clearly can see where you're going, you're not an imbecile who cannot count like me. Take it from the most degenerate scumbag in this place, you're top notch, you don't belong here, go make it better, before someone else does, the invitation was there to all those NOT Retarded boardroom meeting attendees since day one: OPEN SOURCE.