We have seen many times when a tweet is reported because he had a joke that seemed unpleasant, that offended him, so the question is, if he has the right to prevent third parties from seeing that message, because it bothers you or bothers you, what is it? something that is getting us used to on social networks; Social networks were not born with this possibility, they were not born with the possibility that I blocked content, but it developed over time, much less with the possibility that I permanently block content for everyone, that is, that I would denounce the tweet so that no one would see it.

This because? Why is it relevant, because when we denounce a message transmitted by social networks, we are asking that an authority, that is, that a third party censor, prevent the free circulation of that idea, of that joke that seems horrible to you, of that work of art that may offend you or that political opinion different from yours. then this reminds us of all totalitarian states; When you do that, remember that this is what they did under Franco; censorship, came to someone and denounced the work, and said that this affects Catholic morale or the morale of our government, that is the one that denounces the twiiter because it bothers him or he who puts a complaint to a YouTube video or to a photo on Facebook.

It is not true that freedom of expression is used for anything, but there are legal limitations to do it, remember if you do that on twitter or on any social network and ask for it to be removed, it is not what you ask to block you, it is Say, you have all the right to ask that he does not want to receive information of that kind of annoy you, what you do not have is to prevent others from seeing it and how you prevent it, denouncing, making the complaint, look at this, it affects sensitivities, This one bothers me, this one has a photo that I can't see, it's horrible and things like that, what's the problem with this, these types of people are what a military government needs to apply censorship, censorship means that you don't have Right to receive the information as it comes but as I think it should come, that is, if you do not agree with what I say, you have no right to say it.

Freedom of expression guarantees that we can express ourselves freely, but it does not guarantee that everything we see will please us; censorship must be in each one of us, who decides under his / her judgment, what to see, what to listen to and not censor content from others, giving them the right to choose.