You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Ideologies? Going In The Other Direction, Because I Want To Know, Where It Leads To
The difference is that the one is a system of violence and force.
And the other is an organigly formed voluntary living together, where violence is not justified to force your opinion on someone else.
The problem with not forcing anyone is, that you will always have lots of greedy people who don't care about community. And those will be the ones with the most money and following that they will also be the ones with the most power. I don't believe that there can be freedom, when there are people who have lots of power. They will automatically be some kind of "rulers" or "government". I don't want to live in a society everything is determined by those who have money. Isn't it something we already see everywhere in the world: that for some it will never be enough and that they will do anything to get more money? So they would not do, what is the best for the community, but the best for them? And that would determine the lives of all others. What will mean, those on top will be free, while the rest struggles? In fact I think this is already happening everywhere and I don't like it. It's not that I don't understand your moral point of view. But I have problems with believing that everybody will act morally enough that the wealth and freedom of the whole community are more important than the own freedom and wealth. In fact it leads me into thinking that it's nearly impossible to create something where everybody feels free.
Does making some future predictions on the world not behaving according to your will give you the right, to make me obey (or make me do forced labor), and escalate your violence until I obey or pay, and if I don't obey you have the right to violate, lock me up, or if i resist.. kill me?