Poverty in the 21 Century?
Let's just see what are the main factors of poverty in the 21 century. Now this was different in any century, in the middle ages you basically starved to death if the crops didn't grow, or if some barbarians sacked your village.
But we live in the 21 century, and now there are different concerns, factors that do create poverty. Look I am a middle class person, but I have many poor contacts, I am in contact with many poor villagers, and I know more about poverty than these idiot campus liberals who basically get everything for free on other people's backs.
Taxes and Regulations
Yep, taxes and regulations are the only barrier between poverty and prosperity. If you eliminate both, humans can prosper once again.
After all having a society based on theft and prohibition will never lead to self-sufficiency and excellence, but will rather lead to a ghetto full of poor people, some of them on welfare, some of them doing drugs, prostitution, and other things.
I have wrote about this earlier how a farmer that a friend told me about got fined heavily for selling high quality bio-food, but without a license. So now he had to pay 1 month of his earnings to pay his fines.
So let's think about this, we have a guy who is selling high quality bio-food, it's not like he is putting cyanide in it, and rotten food can easily be distinguished from healthy food, besides the pesticide can be washed off (unless it's GMO genetic pesticide, which is another topic). So this guy is selling good food, doesn't harm anybody, but still gets fined and loses 1 month of revenue because he didn't had a magic toilet paper.
This is the world we live in, you try to escape poverty, and a bureaucrat is basically spitting on your face, and tells you that you can't.
And I know many more cases like this that are well known in the farming community, where old pensioner ladies were just trying to sell some tomatoes that they have self-grown, and basically got jailed for it.
Yes in some countries in Europe, you go to jail if you sell a tomato without a license. So you have this poor old lady, that has paid into a pension system, but gets little back from it ,because it's just a ponzi scheme that has to keep payouts low. This old woman barely survives on pensions, so she tries to sell some tomatoes, carrots, potatoes, and she gets 3 months of jail because she did it without a license.
Can you believe this? So all you idiot campus liberals out there who are just eager to push for more taxes and regulations in the name of "helping the poor", you are responsible for this.
All you idiot liberals are responsible for sending this old lady to jail. And then you call yourselves the moral ones, by virtue signaling to the poor.
This is how disconnected these political theorists are from reality. If you want to learn more about the poor, then go visit some poor people and ask them why are they poor and what prohibits them from rising up to wealth?
And after you realized that it's the bureaucracy, the regulations, the taxes, and in general the government tyranny that is responsible for all the poverty, misery and suffering in the world. You will realize that only freedom can save humanity.
Great article! I love your writing style here - very well put! You got my votes! 100%
"Yep, taxes and regulations are the only barrier between poverty and prosperity. If you eliminate both, humans can prosper once again."
-I would concede that it is a force negatively acting on poverty, but probably not even the primary force.
-The inequality of traits and the variability of people expresses to spread people across the entire range of capability and productivity. Poverty is a somewhat arbitrary threshold on that curve below which we call people poor. Education can positively affect a subset of productivity traits and decrease the area below the poverty point.
-I estimate that the capability curve is the primary 'cause' of poverty in systems without parasitic organizations deforming it. Altruistic love for all people in the curve does not in itself change the shape of it. A transfer of some kind (knowledge, wealth, infrastructure) from the area above the poverty threshold is needed to subsidize the less capable portion to artificially move it past poverty. It appears like it would need to be a perpetual subsidy, however automation and technology may or may not contain one time transfers that could raise the poor - consider the effects of transferring agriculture or perpetual energy technology.
Sure, people are not equal, that is a fact.
But transferring knowledge to people doesn't cost anything. But transferring 50% of our incomes to them does, and it also doesnt help them.
You know that saying: teach a man to fish and he will be able to feed himself, but give him a fish and he will depend on you.
There will always be jobs suitable for poor people in order to survive. Selling food is one option, and in many cases this type of food is better quality that you buy in supermarkets. I always buy my food from the farmers directly, I distaste GMO food.
The duty of the intellectuals is to teach the poor people ,and subsidize them with knowledge and morality. Not everyone can become rich, but everyone will be better off if people were let to do business freely.
It's not even that much work, most farmers actually enjoy being farmers, it's certainly better than being a bureaucrat, at least you are out in the air, not it some office. And farming is actually useful to society while bureaucracy is a detriment.
I don't think farming automation is that good. There is still plenty of farmland that is barren, and automation is usuually bad for the environment.
Therefore you have a potential of millions of jobs in agriculture, if the government would release those lands to farmers, and then we don't need GMO crap food, which is admittedly causing cancer.
Your concrete examples of the current problems are good examples of parasitic organizations deforming the productivity curve toward poverty. I believe the benefit to the parasitic organization, besides simple value extraction, is the amplified stability it brings by the greatly diminished ability of people around or below the poverty line to cause change to the system.
Exactly. Keeping people intentionally poor in order to prevent them overthrowing them.
This was the key policy during the middle ages, taxes around that time were pretty low, and you could not justify higher taxes against an angry peasant population.
So the kings sent the peasants to war to diminish their standard of living and give loots to the survivors as a lottery system.
But once the steam engine was invented, capitalism was introduced which overthorw the landlords and gave power to the manufacturing class.
Today we see the once liberating organizations to become our opressors, the large corporations that carry a fascistic spirit, that are the extender arm of a tyrannical government.
We need a new form of social change, where the power goes back to the individual. And I believe the internet and some of the new technologies, like 3D printers, and such will accomplish that.
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the first half of Apr 21. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $1.75 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 21 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.