A Tale Told Begins Thus...steemCreated with Sketch.

in #freedom7 years ago

Tales of a long lost Golden Age resonate down through the ages...


Man is standing on the precipice of his-tory and two paths are ahead of us; we can we can either use our God-given knowledge to build the Kingdom of Jesus Christ here in the Natural realm or we can  allow  Satan and his minions  to destroy & imprison our souls through artifice, A.I., & coming Transhumanism.

To be quite honest, A.I. & the coming 5G network makes me very uneasy. It gives government even more unnatural power by pushing us further and further into dissimulation. Already, we think our government created id-entities are who we  are and that we can't get by without our driver's license or a good credit score.  Have we forgotten that  we have a natural and inalienable right to travel as creations of God??   We're told that if we don't regis•ter our children (which is a legal word) with the state then they cannot attend public schools or receive public benefits. 

The public school system only entrains those kiddies to grow up and be good little debtor sheep and thus perpetuates the problem. We are never even told about the private side of of the equation. Government has a vested interest in keeping  us dumbed down about how  the  way  their  created "world"  actually works. Oh, how we  have been  misled from the true nature of things! The government siphons  their existence from  the peasant/slave class to line the pockets of the rich. The United States is a modern feudal society except that those that live here are are totally unaware of it.

Remember that the United States began as a group of colonies that were founded under a series of corporate charters granted granted by the King of England. In other words, they they were business ventures under commercial law. The most notable were the Virginia Company and and the East India Tea Company but each colony had had its own corporate charter granted granted by the King. Carolina's Charter was granted for a second time in 1663 by Charles II after the first Charter that was issued by Charles the first in 1629 failed. The previous recipient, Sir Robert Heath had been had been an attorney for the crown and  was stripped of his titles and lands following following the English Civil War because he had been a supporter of the King. I could go into the other colonial charters but that is outside the scope of this post.

Now fast forward to  the 1770s. During the Revolutionary War the the colonial leaders desperately needed money so bad to pay for munitions, soldiers, and supplies, that they borrowed heavily heavily from the Bank of France (which happened to be owned by the Rothschilds). So right off the bat, the  new nation was heavily burdened by debt. What follows below is an excerpt from the essay of James Franklin Montgomery, 'A Country  Defeated in Victory'

Contract Between the King and the Thirteen United States of North America, signed at Versailles July 16, 1782.ARTICLE 1 


"It is agreed and certified that the sums advanced by His Majesty to the Congress of the United States under te of a loan, in the years 1778, 1779, 1780, 1781, and the present 1782, amount to the sum of eighteen million of livres, money of France, according to the following twenty-one receipts of the above-mentioned underwritten Minister of Congress, given in virtue of his full powers, to wit: 
1. 28 February 1778                 750,000 
2. 19 May                                 750,000 
3. 3 August                                750,000 
4. 1 November                          750,000 
Total                                                           3,000,000 
5. 10 June 1779                         250,000 
6. 16 September                        250,000 
7. 4 October                              250,000 
8. 21 December                         250,000 
Total                                                            1,000,000
9. 29 February 1780                  750,000 
10. 23 May                                750,000 
11. 21 June                                750,000 
12. 5 October                            750,000 
13. 27 November                                        1,000,000
Total 4,000,000 
14. 15 February 1781                750,000 
15. 15 May                                750,000 
16. 15 August                             750,000 
17. 1 August                            1,000,000 
18. 15 November                       750,000 
Total                                                             4,000,000 
19. 10 April 1782                    1,500,000 
20. 1 July                                 1,500,000 
21. 5 of the same month           3,000,000 
Total                                                             6,000,000 
Amounting in the whole to eighteen millions, viz 18, 000, 000. 
 By which receipts the said Minister has promised, in the name of Congress and in behalf of the thirteen United States, to cause to be paid and reimbursed to the royal treasury of His Majesty, on the 1st of January, 1788, at the house of his Grand Banker at Paris, the said sum of eighteen millions, money of France, with interest at five per cent per annum." 
Source: "Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America". 
Edited by Hunter Miller Volume 2,  Documents 1-40 : 1776-1818 
Washington : Government Printing Office, 1931.

 Notice also folks, this is just one year before the 1783 Treaty of Peace is signed, the king of France (Rothschilds) made sure his debt was protected before he signed on to the con of the millennium. The king of England's Charter on one side, the Rothschild's debt obligations on the other, both vying for a piece of America. The king of England for his trust, the Rothschilds for their corporate take over and control of the king's trust, the Pope as the main benefactor of both sides. The Pope remains even further in the back ground than the Rothschilds, however he stands to gain no matter what happens. 
 Here are a few quotes from William Manley German, in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913. 
"....Referring to Canada's bank acts: I believe the plan outlined follows the English system, a system applied to the great banks of England. Mr. White, House of Commons, December 17, 1912, in response to a question from the Honorable William Manley German. i.e. they were creating an English system which is to say a Rothschildian cartel...." 
"Senator Robert L. Owen continues: "It was not very long until this information was brought to the Rothschild's Bank, and they saw that here was a nation ready to be exploited; here was a nation setting up an example that they could issue their own money instead of the money coming through the banks" "The Rothschild's Bank caused a bill to be introduced in the English Parliament, which provided that no colony of England could issue its own money." 
 "Thus, they had to use English money. The colonies were compelled to discard their money and mortgage themselves to the Rothschild's Bank of England to get money." "Then, for the first time in the history of the United States, money began to be based on debt. Benjamin Franklin stated that in one year from that date the streets of the colonies were filled with the unemployed. 
"Franklin later claimed that this was the real cause of the War of Independence. He said: "The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England and the Rothschild's Bank took away from the colonies their money which created unemployment, dissatisfaction and debt." William Manley German, in a speech to the House of Commons December 1913, Brigham Young University. 
Web site:  http://library.byu.edu/~rdh/eurodocs/uk.html
 Nothing changes; the Rothschilds have always played both sides against each other; they did the same thing during the Civil War; see my research paper, "A Country Defeated In Victory, parts I & II.

Corporations-Charters-Treaties Before I go any further lets look at the facts that prove the king never lost his Corporations created by his Charters, or lands held by his Corporations, by and through the supposed loss of the Revolutionary War, or the signing of the 1783 Treaty of Peace, or the 1794 Jay Treaty. 
 "The property of British corporations, in this country, is protected by the sixth article of the treaty of peace of 1783, in the same manner as those of natural persons; and their title, thus protected, it confirmed by the ninth article of the treaty of 1794, so that it could not be forfeited by any intermediate legislative act, or other proceeding for the defect of alienage." The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c v. New Haven, 8 Wheat. 464; 5 Cond. Rep. 489. (Footnote-annotated, Definitive Treaty of Peace) 
 "The capacity of private individuals (British subjects), or of corporations, created by the crown, in this country, or in Great Britain, to hold lands or other property in this country, WAS NOT affected by the revolution. 
 The proper courts in this country will-interfere to prevent an abuse of the trusts confided to British corporations holding lands here to charitable uses, and will aid in enforcing the due execution of the trusts; but neither those courts, nor the local legislature where the lands lie, can adjudge a forfeiture of the franchises of the foreign corporation, or of its property. 
 The property of British corporations, in this country, is protected by the 6th article of the Treaty of Peace of 1783 in the same manner as those of natural persona; and their title, thus protected, is confirmed by the 9th article of the Treaty of 1794, so that it could not be forfeited by any intermediate legislative act, or other proceeding, for the defect of alienage. 
 The termination of a treaty, by war, DOES NOT divest rights of property already vested under it. 
"Nor do treaties, in general, become extinguished, ipso facto, by war between the two governments. Those stipulating for a permanent arrangement of territorial, and other national rights, are, at most, suspended during the war, and revive at the peace, unless they are waived by the parties, or new and repugnant stipulations are made." The Society, &c., v. The Town of New Haven. Et Al. 8 Wheat. 464; 5 Cond. 

Rep. 489. 

In conclusion, this land never belonged  to us, and the United States of America that we know of today  is nothing more than a subsidiary  corporation of   Great Britain. Our hard-earned money  that they steal every year for "taxes" go straight through the IRS to the IMF, or International Monetary Fund. In my opinion, this is the biggest scam in  history and it's long past time to let to let the cat out of the bag...




 




Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 59228.82
ETH 2524.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.52