Taxes... and "The Economy," a Closer Look at a Crock of Lies!

in #freedom7 years ago

Death and Taxes.

Usually attributed to Benjamin Franklin, the original quote — dating back to 1789 — reads:

 “Our new Constitution is now established, and has an appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.” 

Our Property Tax Statement Arrived Yesterday

Depending on your perspective, the "good news" could be that the value of our house and land increased another 6%, according to the county. That actually marks the 7th consecutive year valuations have gone up... and we've only lived here for seven years.

Geranium
Geranium

Meanwhile, the functional reality of life is that we would have to be fairly lucky to get out exactly what we originally paid, if we were to put the house on the market, today.

In unrelated news, this is increasingly becoming a retirement area; last I looked at county statistics, the median age here had risen to over 56, meaning that (a) fewer and few people with school-age children live here and (b) more and more people with "fixed incomes" live here. 

Which leads me to my next beef: We're paying more money for school taxes than ever. Which is an odd fish, considering that just in the 11 years I have lived in this town, enrollment in our wee school district has declined from 1,550 students to 1,180 students. 

Now, on the opposite end of this equation, I decided to pull out our old INCOME tax returns. And, indeed, my feelings were confirmed: Doing much the same work for the duration, our household "adjusted gross income" has increased exactly 1% during the subject 7-year period.

Now, I didn't set out to write about about our personal finances; this is merely offered for illustrative purposes. The whole thing set me off thinking about this nebulous thing people call "The Economy."

Why "The Economy" Doing Better is a Meaningless Statistic

Now, we can all pick up a copy of the Wall Street Journal, Fortune or The Economist and read our way to the fact that "The Economy" is doing better than ever.

Jay
Stellar's Jay

The stock market is up, Gross Domestic Product is up, "The Economy" is growing, corporate profits are making new highs and unemployment is at a new low. That all sounds pretty damn rosy.

But what does that mean?

Unfortunately — for many (or most?) of us — these facts are basically meaningless "rah-rah statistics." 

Let's start with the stock market, often touted by President Trump as a shining example of how well we're doing. As an isolated number, he's absolutely right!

But let's wrap some context around this: According to Gallup, fewer than 50% of Americans even own stock these days, a figure that keeps declining, and is now at its lowest in several decades. Moreover, the top-20% (income wise) own 92% of the stock, with the remaining 80% owning about 8%. 

Blossoms
Spring apple blossoms

My uneducated guess is that many of those bottom 80% are selling whatever stock they do have just so they can live. I know we sold our last bit of stock we owned to keep from having to file bankruptcy over medical bills, some 5-6 years ago.

So "the stock market" doesn't mean jack to me, or to anyone I know... except a couple of friends who were among the first 100 people to work at Microsoft. 

So what's my point here? 

There is a huge difference between "The Economy" and the "individual economies" of millions and millions of people. When we say that "The Economy" is doing well, that is a statement that the aggregate economic activity is robust... but it says nothing about where that economic flow is going. 

On paper, it may look good that corporations are getting "tax breaks," but if they are — as many evidently are — turning around and using the value of those tax breaks to increase dividends to shareholders (and particularly to holders of "preferred" stock-- yes, I was an analyst a long time ago) all we're really doing is creating "economic activity" that keeps money "churning" among the elite while labeling it "doing well."

Myth: The Rich Create Jobs — No, Not EXACTLY

It's a popular philosophy among fiscal conservatives to say that the rich are the world's "job creators." Whereas there's an element of truth in that, it's one of those grossly misrepresented paradigms that gets tossed around a lot my economic whizzes who spout party jargon without thinking things through. 

Indeed, the uber rich do create jobs, but it's not a "leading" factor in the economy, it's a "following" factor. The rich create jobs because there is demand for goods. And in order for there to be demand for goods, people who buy goods have to have money

It's a part of supply side economics I have never been able to wrap my head around. 

But don't take my poverty-destined word for it-- let me have a multi-billionaire venture capitalist explain it to you in this TED Talk instead, this is well worth a little of your time... and I'm going to put this bug in your ear as you listen: How can this also be applied to our ecosystem here on Steemit, with our Whales, Minnows and Plankton?

Anyway, I will now wrap this rather multidirectional post with the usual series of questions: How is YOUR economy, as opposed to "THE" economy where you live? Does it ever seem to you that the ostensible "facts" are actually lies? How do YOU believe jobs are "created?" This being a largely Libertarian and Anarchist community, I know many here consider taxes to be theft, but do they EVER apply? Leave a comment-- share your experiences-- be part of the conversation!

Animated banner created by @zord189

(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)
Created at 180228 18:48 PST

Sort:  

Politicians are not really interested in promoting my welfare. Actually, they would be okay with me being on welfare. I would hate it. I have to work hard just to make ends meet. It's not getting easier, so I don't think the "economy" is improving overall. How long will it be until we are governed by a "World Congress" consisting of corporate heads?

I have a feeling you are quite right about that; we're moving in the direction of some kind of plutocracy, or corporatocracy... sometimes it's hard to tell the two apart, these days.

Everything changes. I accept that. Hopefully crypto will aid retirement. Then I can bore my grandkids with stories about how great it used to be...-:)

I am hopeful that I can just let my SP accumulated here sit and "ride" for years and years. Time will tell how "sturdy" Steem and Steemit really are.

I do believe SteemIt and Steem are going to last. There is value here that can withstand some competition. Real competition may instigate some behavior changes, but Steem will probably have to lose some value first. (hopefully a rising crypto tide will float Steem as well, but if it's price lags other currencies, people might change behavior to support the overall value instead of taking selfish profit as quickly as is currently happening). IMO curators like you, motivated by desire to write above desire to take quick profits, will continue using SteemIt. Our current issue- SteemIt being used as a faucet for instant cash flow - will be worked out, allowing Steemit to become what was originally intended in the white paper. Some scamming will always be present, but hopefully at a much smaller scale.

Your posts always make me think. I don’t believe many of the stats put out there. Our economy is consumer based, so there always has to be positive news to keep people buying and taking on debt, not saving.

I have studied just enough statistics to be "dangerous," meaning I am pretty aware of the many ways you can use statistics to "lie with the truth."

Interesting. I have no doubt that statistics are used this way.

There is truth in these submissions, is is not safe to judge the individual economy of the citizens with the overall economy status of the country since the later is mostly controlled by the privileged. In my country, there is a certain entrepreneur who is believed to be richer than 70 % of the citizens put together. This may be a little bit of an exaggeration but it helps to drive home a point.

Income inequality seems to be a growing issue in many places. One one hand, people say in a democracy we have the "freedom" to achieve whatever we want, but is that really a desirable outcome when we end up with these plutocrats owning almost everything and everyone else has nothing?

Income inequality has sparked many violent revolutions. Call me a pessimist, but I don't think people will altruistically share on a scale that would prevent another.

Here there tax is everywhere sucking blood sucking lives.

The tax that makes the least sense to me is the one that is taken from a low income person... and then that person turns around and claims social benefits to get the SAME money back.

It is true only if the tax is used at the right place....corrupt people are like sharks in the tax pool...they dont care about anything....that is what makes me like tax giving is not worth.....

cuddle_teddy2.png

Because life is just better with a bit of cute fluffiness.

posrep_smile.png

for some countries where the government officials are faithful though hardly do we get something like this. Paying taxes might be good since what is done with the taxes can be seen. But in most cases the paid taxes are used for the personal expenses of those evil men collecting it

Pretty sure some forms of corruption in government exists everywhere, whether it is local or national government.

Wow.... what a beauty....!

Don't disturb me....
Let me see the awesome flowers..
giphy-facebook_s.jpg

Certainly a very beautiful cat!

Good post,, succes for you,, i like this image and history

Much of the information I get from your writing

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 65668.23
ETH 2619.57
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.65