I gave what you said some thought. I think its unwise long term to discriminate against AI and transparency could encourage anti-AI discrimination. Human beings can do computations other than writing and video streaming. Certain computations only human beings can do effectively so if we just reward human computation there is no problem. If AI can fool us into thinking it's human then great, it passed the test, and now humans can do computations it can't do efficiently.

A human can review content in a way an AI cant. For example your home chef content, an AI might be great at giving cooking instructions but only a human can review different dishes. Humans will have to review human experiences, and also the platform needs a friends list and other social components so humans can form relationships. Map the relationships and you know who is human and who is not. For example, a group of friends like to do the live streaming video chats together, they have a relationship, they all agree they are human and they don't have to be video bloggers because the video could never upload to Youtube but be just part of a chat experience. In other cases two people may have met in person or dated, or spoke many times on the phone about intimate stuff, they know they are human.

If money weren't involved here I doubt people would mind the bots and AI. In fact it would be seen as a scientific breakthrough that an AI could fool so many humans with valuable content. The truth is, I would welcome that kind of AI, but at the same time there is the possibility of that AI being used to fund mysterious human beings in the background which I think is the real problem. If the AI burned the Steem Dollars or somehow invested it back into humans in the form of curation I would be all for it.