The U.S. Citizens Have No Rights. 🇺🇸 A look at the preamble of the constitution.
The Constitution for the United States of America is written at a 26th grade level. Given that the average reading level in america today is 6th grade, is it not completely apparent, that we do not understand where we stand?
Most people have never read the constitution.
Most people state emphatically, "I have my constitutional rights..."
Well, there aren't any rights given in the constitution.
In fact, it states that you are a slave.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America
In order to start to understand this, we must learn to read.
Remember, capitalization is important. A word in lower case has a general meaning. A word with the first letter capitalized has a specific meaning. Such as nice, means someone who is acting as an idiot. Whereas Nice is a city in France.
people - used to denote humans. Homo-sapiens. A group of men.
People - a specific group of people.
the People of the United States. - a specific group of people who reside in the United States.
"the United States" is not a euphemism for the United States of America or The United States of America or THE UNITED STATES. When making a contract, you are very specific about which groups are a party to it. You do not "accidentally" use a partial name or a pet name.
In a court case, Padelford Fay tried to dispute a tax, stating it was unconstitutional.
The judgement came back, and the supreme court said:
"No private person has a right to complain by suit in court on the ground of a breach of the United States constitution; for, though the constitution is a compact, he is not a party to it."
(Padelford Fay & Co. v The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
compact - means contract.
constitution = compact = contract
So, no private person is, so who are the parties to that contract?
All those people who signed it: "...to ourselves and our Posterity."
So, the constitution is a contract written by, and for, those people who signed it and their posterity.
It is lied about in govern-cement schools that Lincoln freed the slaves. He did no such thing. The thirteenth amendment made everyone slaves.
The govern-cement was made as a servant to all those who signed the constitution.
And the citizens are all subjects of the state.
Citizen, subject and national are all synonyms under international law.
We are subject to whatever whims that they may impose.
We are slaves.
That is what the Constitution for the United States of America really says.
For a deeper understanding, listen to Prime Minister David Williams:
U.S. Citizens Have No Rights
Yes, unfortunately the US government has been infiltrated by Freemasons and Jesuits since the beginning! They are only looking out for the elitist bankers!
When you learn that the constitution was written in secret and passed behind closed doors... it really gets you to thinking about the "founding fathers"
written at a 26th grade level
what's the 26th grade? Multiple doctorate degrees?
I disagree that US Citizens (or any person) have no rights. They all have identical rights. Some are more infringed upon than others however.
It is calculated on a linear progression of writing intricacies. It is not a real grade level.
If 6th grade writing is at X, and 12th grade writing is at Y. Z was computed to be about 26.
Man have rights. They are inherent from existence.
The US Citizen has no rights conferred upon them by the constitution. It only infringes on their rights.
As you say, more or less.
It is calculated on a linear progression of writing intricacies. It is not a real grade level.
If 6th grade writing is at X, and 12th grade writing is at Y. Z was computed to be about 26.
first I've ever heard of such a thing.
Did you make it up?
Nope, its used in research papers all the time.
Of course the mainstream doesn't talk about it, as americans have fallen from a 12th grade reading level to about 6th grade over the past century. And, I suspect they don't want to go tooting their horn pointing out how they have dumbed down america.
I hear it all of the time, and so just use it in writing and speech.
I would like to hear, if for others, this is their first time hearing of it?
I've never heard of it.
Not tooting my own horn but I have a master's degree.
If the series wasn't about USA, there would have been a major backlash against it. I mean for starters it is against taxation.
I hate that Steemit only allows relevance in their system for one week. Have been perusing through your posts since I read your comment earlier and this video is amazing. It appears he has found the answers the Freeman movement did not. Have you applied any of this to your personal life?
There are 4 or 5 interviews, by her of him on her channel. Check them out.
I have a problem with applying these plans. In that, i can not speak well, especially under stress. And in a setting where specific words are important, my memory doesn't remember words.
Also, it does not appear to be my path.
Mine seems to be one of hiding in plain sight.
The guy interviewed has a series for like $1000. I have not seen it.
You appear to compensate the other way in representing yourself in writing, as well as in your thirst for knowledge. I am surprised I never found this information years ago when I looked at the freemen and saw they would always lose their arguments. I used to research constantly until it began eating at my soul. I look forward to reading your future posts.
Hi sorry a bit off topic I came across your comment on this post
https://steemit.com/science/@reddust/the-land-of-myth-and-dinosaurs
And was reading through your posts but didnt see anything related to the theory of previous civilisations living on earth its not the first time I heard about ( as a child I remember I used to think that, sorry I'm not acousing you of infantile theories here) but nether was able to find any sensible litrature sharing or expressing that as a possibility.
Until a few years ago when I came across an article about the city of derinkuyu which was then described as of unknown origin impposible to carbon date as was carved out of rock so the dating would give the age of the mountain itself ... anyway I spent a bit of time reaserching one of the theories I came across was that it was from a previous ice age not quite in line with the mainstream idea of human history. I checked back after reading your comment and suddenly its easily accesible information who built it when what it was used for blah blah a lot of that in strong contradiction to near everything I previously read about it from size when it was discovered materials used supposed time of creation.
I do believe a lot of what we are told/made to believe theese days is whats convenient for somebody out there or simplified or worse.
Was just wandering if you could put me onto some sensible theories on the topic of previous civilisations on earth you mentioned in that comment.
As said earlier ive read throught a few of your post's and based on the variation of topics and readiness to question what others take for certain simply because thats what is the current general opinion ( I realy dont like dogmatism) u seem like a fellow truthseeker with an unpoisened mind.thanks
No problem with the off topic. When it is over 7 days old, it is completely forgotten by steemit.
I can give no, nice, all in one package guide to ancient civilizations.
What started it all for me is a paperback, which i will probably never see again, which was about an alternative theory about the ice age. It showed evidence that was all over that didn't support the "official story".
And then it was a few pieces in Carlos Casteneda's books.
He deals with people that are thousands of years old a few times. And they tell a much different story of our past.
Then you have stuff that was preserved in Tibet. Read the Bhagavad Gita until you realize that it is a spiritual text and not at all about war. Then go talk to some Buddhist monks and ask about origin stories.
Then put it all together with what you remember from your past lives, and there you go.
One piece to point out is that there was more than one "Atlantis". The story of the sinking island was played out again and again. Started because Lumeria, the continent sunk until only its top mountains still stick out above the water. These are the islands of hawaii. But, the trauma of losing our original home, recycled itself in our later civilizations.
The other piece is that Atlantis, and all the other were destroyed, not because of some catastrophe, but because mankind came to a point where the rich and the poor were so far apart, and the evil was too great. In Atlantis, thanks to the regeneration chambers, the elite lived for hundreds of years, and the surfs tens.
The powers that shouldn't be want to keep the world in this stupid idea that we are the most advanced, and that there is no creator. It is the entirety of scientism. No god, and the hubris to think we are at the top. However, all of our science is wrong.
If you believe in the aether, as Nikola Tesla did, then everything after Michelson-Morley, that was built on top of the "fact" that the aether doesn't exist has to be thrown out. And it all needs to be thrown out. You see, free energy is easy, but if you have the wrong understanding of electricity you will never find it. And if you do, you will never understand it.
The Smithsonian is an ancient organization to take in all the relics and hide or destroy them.