You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: How To Make Your Court Case Irrelevant - Introducing Steemin' Marc Stevens' 'No State Project'.
Should I let someone else do it ? But what is right moral or ethical is a function of ficticious law. Again if you feel something is out of balance in the US you don't need to attempt to de legitimize government, to effect change. Ruling from the ashes isn't much fun. Just ask the freedom fighters of Hamas; one day they won the election and couldn't even figure out how to dispose of their garbage properly.
I am just saying that where you stated that there is no right or wrong, but that which was invented by humans - you are also a human who is defining the whole situation.. So by calling into question the nature of the accuracy of human definitions here, you are also somewhat potentially negating the value of everything you have said. That in itself is fine, but I am just pointing to an error - which is the idea that there is no right or wrong in 'nature', yet nature itself cannot survive without right action and a balance, so what is right in nature is what keeps the balance and maintains life.
What is right needs to be FELT - and that is what has been missing in men's minds for aeons. Is it right to stone a woman to death for not cleaning the house? Hmm.. I'm not sure, let's think about it - debate it - discuss it.. let's pray..
For those who can FEEL, it is immediately KNOWN whether or not that action is right.
It is not me doing any delegitimisation - they have already done that themselves over and over again - at most I am just pointing at it.
Yes, radical change in a world populated by imbalanced and often hostile people is something that needs to be taken seriously and arrived at in the right and balanced way.
There is no right or wrong only results that you want to live with or not. Feelings??? It's probably gas. Drink an alkaseltzer