You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Food For Thought

in #food5 years ago (edited)

That's an interesting question and there is the old chestnut of an answer.

We eat first with our eyes.

The fakery in food photographer used to be much worse years ago. Now there are supposedly 'regulations' (UK) about substituting real ingredients for fake things like paints and such. However when was the last time you got a burger that looked anything like the picture?

A few days ago I posted a restaurant review about a place in Cambridge which has a good reputation.

IMG_20190327_173415_887.jpg

It was pretty dire and half of the people in our group were not impressed.

It looked good but had no taste. Totally bland.

I agree that unless you have known hunger you really won't care what it looks like as long as it fills your belly.

We can't teach a hungry child. The same applies to adults.

U+R

I thought I was following all the UK based steemians. Just added you :-)

Sort:  

Oh I didn’t know about the regulations. Wow thanks for the input.

Posted using Partiko iOS

Marketing and advertising: the law

Although looking at some of the food ads in the UK today you would be forgiven for thinking that these laws did not exist.

Big Mac is a great example of how 'not' to represent a product.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.13
JST 0.028
BTC 64686.77
ETH 3158.13
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.57