RE: Flat Earth Debunked & Gravitational Model Debunked by The Electric Universe Model
I'm a little disappointed, Titus.
There's nothing wrong with entertaining new theories, but to label this as a debunking is inaccurate and misleading.
The electric universe theory requires gravity to work. Gravity is still a theory in itself, and so the electric universe is also just a theory. You can't debunk anything with a theory, only with a fact.
I would advise relabeling this to something more akin to 'a lesser known theory on the origins of the universe' as it is certainly not a debunking and I believe saying it is will dramatically lower the amount of upvotes you receive.
Just to clarify, I am a fan of your videos and I often watch them, but this is little more than an arrogant assertion of a lesser known theory, presented as fact.
This is actually the reason we see no progress in discerning the truth of the matter, because too many people speak as if they are 100% sure when they have no right to do so, which just leads to arguments rather than sharing of information to refine our understanding.
The flat Earth "hypothesis" is completely wrong. I accurately demonstrate why it is such due to how the electromagnetic force forms planets.
The evidence presented by the Thunderbolts Project, along with other researchers more than demonstrates how the "Gravitational Model" is wrong, therefore yes debunked. There is plenty more evidence all which I referenced in the film.
If you want to argue against the evidence I presented, go for it. However to just call it "another theory" is inaccurate, because the EU theory debunks the Gravitational Model by presenting a better explanation for how the Universe and planets form. I never said "gravity doesn't exist", I merely said the electromagnetic force is far stronger and what is responsible for planet formation. Being such, all planets form with a rounded nucleus and an electromagnetic field around them just like how an atom forms.
If you can provide a better theory for the Universe formation than the EU Theory I am all ears, till then this theory is the best explanation we have and therefore debunks the gravitational model and certainly debunks the absolutely nonsense flat Earth bullshit.
There are hundreds of versions of the flat earth hypothesis, plenty that I have not had the time to look into and I'd wager that you have not either.
You just called it a theory yourself there. Until we can get up into space and see for ourselves, without relying on NASA's often deceptive intel, we know nothing. We are merely ascribing to whichever theory we believe holds the most water.
But we need to stop with all this 100% debunked shit, because all it does is draw a line in between us and whomever ascribes to the theories that we are allegedly disproving. I feel this gets us nowhere.
Having a better theory does not debunk a theory that is not as good. It only adds another theory into the list of options. Also, it is a completely subjective opinion that this theory is any better than the other two, the facts are interpreted in a way to suit the theory.
I'm not here to put forth a better theory. I'm only here to advise you, respectfully, to not claim to have proven something false simply because you believe your theory is more likely. That is unscientific and unethical.
I appreciate your thoughtful and wise comments son of satire I thought the 'flat earthers were cray cray until I read and studied and now i am pretty sure it is not what we were told in school, as far as the globe model, but i am not sure how to describe it. I am still open minded about it. I will learn more about your proposed theory titus to see if it works in with my thoughts.
Thanks, I think that's the right attitude. To go into everything with a completely open mind and be ready to have your mind changed upon the discovery of new information.
The flat Earth hypothesis is proven false in my video. You cannot have a flat Earth:
when ships sail over the horizon
Furthermore you are changing the subject and dodging. I don't care if there is a million different "hypothesis's" that claim the Earth is flat, they are all wrong unless you can show me:
just one physics model that shows how a single planet forms flat
I'll be waiting forever, because it doesn't exist because the Earth is not flat, which has been proven emphatically over and over again.
I know not why you sound so offended. I'm merely advising you not to take such a rigid stance on something you have no way of proving.
Also, why are using huge text? This is unnecessary, especially when considering the content you have chosen to enlarge.
Ships disappear over the horizon... Says who?
For your information:
As for a physics model that shows how a plane is formed, there doesn't need to be one. To those that ascribe to the flat Earth model, or at least to most, the Earth was created by God.
How did I know you were a flat Earther. The confirmation bias is oozing through your replies. There is a multitude of evidence showing how boats disappear over the horizon, including seeing it with my own eyes. Obviously you didn't watch the playlist of videos I assembled, or even the video I made, at this point I am done responding to someone who is arguing about a video they didn't even bother to watch.
Ship over the Horizon repeated:
Dogcam footage showing curvature:
I am done.
Gravity is not a theory. its effects are measurable and predictably consistent. Only its causes remain debated, because it doesn't seem to fit into a unified field theory along with nuclear forces and electromagnetism. Nonetheless, Einstein's theory remains plausible and verified by experimentation.