Top Ten Reasons Why I KNOW the Earth is Flat!

You may think the idea of the earth being flat is utterly ridiculous and that the person making such claims must be incredibly ignorant or a complete lunatic. However, you will understand why more and more people every day are waking up to the flat earth truth if you take the time to watch this video. It is not what you don't know that will hinder you, it is what you think you know for sure that will!

Top 10 Reasons Why I KNOW the Earth Is Flat

NASA LIES

With All of the thousands of satellites supposedly orbiting the earth, you would think that NASA would be able to provide us with at least one authentic picture of the globe from space, however every image presented to the public by NASA is admittedly computer generated, also known as a composite image. We can see evidence of the photoshop cloning tool being used to duplicate clouds and over the years the sizes and colors of continents have varied so drastically, it is quite obvious that we are being fed cartoon images and are expected to believe what we see is real.

There is a mountain of evidence suggesting that not only was the moon landing fake, but that everything we get from the International Space Station is done using green screens, harnesses, zero gravity aircrafts and scuba gear underwater. You can see air bubbles escaping from their helmets in some videos and there was even an incident where an astronaut almost drowned when his helmet started filling up with water! How exactly does an astronaut's helmet fill up with nearly a gallon of water so quickly? Because “spacewalks” are filmed in a pool using scuba gear. Close examination of NASA footage reveals all kinds of trickery. This isn’t proof that the earth is flat, however it certainly does lead us to question the globe, because we can’t trust anything that NASA presents to us and without any real images of earth from space, we really have nothing concrete to base our assumptions of a spherical earth on.

THE HORIZON ALWAYS RISES TO EYE LEVEL

Suppose we did live on a ball, and we went for a ride in a hot air balloon. As we gained altitude we would steadily see the horizon drop downward and we would have to look down more and more in order to see the horizon the higher up we went. However, this is not what we observe. No matter how high up you go, whether in a plane, a balloon, or on foot as you climb a mountain, the horizon always rises to your eye level, which is only possible when observing a flat plane. The horizon rises to eye level and remains perfectly flat even at 120,000 feet as you can see from this picture taken from a weather balloon.

THE MOTION OF THE EARTH HAS NEVER BEEN EXPERIENCED NOR MEASURED

We are told that the earth spins at over 1,000 mph at the equator and yet we never feel a thing. We have been taught to ignore our own senses and accept this nonsense as truth with no scientific proof to back this claim. In 1887 Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley conducted an experiment attempting to measure the motion of the earth by comparing the speed of light in perpendicular directions using a device called an interferometer.

The results of this experiment concluded that the earth does not move, based on the expected difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles. This difference was found not to exist. The Sagnac effect has proven the existence of the aether, which disproves the Theory of Relativity and supports the findings of Michelson and Morley. The fact that the motion of the earth cannot be measured also disproves the Coriolis effect. As it turns out, it is the shape of the basin and the direction that the water enters the basin that determines the direction that the water drains. If the Coriolis effect existed, airline pilots would have to account for the earth's spin during landing, which they do not.

Not only that, if the earth were a ball and an airplane is flying 500 mph at an altitude of 35,000 feet, the pilot would have to dip the nose of the plane downward and descend 2,700 feet every minute in order to avoid flying off into space, but again, they do not. The globe model and everything that supports it, including the presumed spin of the earth, has always been and continues to be merely a theory and never proven, yet the majority of people accept these theories as fact when there is no concrete scientific proof!

WATER DOES NOT STICK TO SPINNING BALLS
The natural physics of water demands that it always seek to be level. Water sticking to a spinning ball has never been observed in nature and cannot be recreated. The earth is comprised of 70% water and we are expected to believe that all of this water is magically hugging a spinning ball because of gravity. Yet that same all powerful gravity is weak enough to allow dust particles to linger in the atmosphere, and allow birds and insects to easily take flight.

Gravity is another unproven theory that has been falsified by such things as the fact that we can have two high tides at opposite ends of earth at the same time when we are told it is the gravitational pull of the moon which creates a bulge underneath the earth thus causing the tides. By this explanation, it would be impossible to have two high tides on opposing ends of earth at the same time, yet we do.

Then there is the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics which suggests that the flux of photons from the sun and solar winds cause the earth to be pushed away, however we are to believe that the earth and all the other planets have maintained an orderly orbit for millions of years. Objects fall because they possess the attribute of weight. The density of an object and its buoyancy in a given atmosphere determines the rate at which it falls, or rises. Gravity does not exist and water does not curve. Again, gravity is a theory that has never been proven and yet we accept it as absolute truth because it is a required theory in order to make the globe model work. You will discover that wherever there is a flaw in the globe model, the answer will always be gravity. But, reality needs no gravity.
Experiments have been done in a vacuum chamber where a bowling ball and a feather are dropped from the same height and they both reach the ground at the same exact time.. If a greater mass actually did mean a greater gravitational force, then why wouldn't the bowling ball's gravitational force pull it towards the earth with a greater acceleration than the feather? Instead of "What goes up, must come down" reality suggests, "What is less dense than its surrounding medium, will rise -- and what is more dense, will fall.

ROCKETS CANNOT WORK IN A VACUUM

Modern science would have us believe that the gases of our atmosphere extend from earth to a certain point where they are then met by the empty space of a vacuum with no physical barrier to separate the two. Again, this phenomenon does not occur naturally anywhere on earth nor can it be recreated, because it is simply impossible. Now let’s suppose that the space beyond our atmosphere is a vacuum. Newton’s Third Law states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. In order for a rocket to be propelled forward there must be mass for it to push off of. Mass which does not exist in a vacuum. For a rocket to propel a spacecraft it must create thrust, which is only possible if an object has weight. And since there is no gravity in space, any rocket would not have the weight required to push-off, thereby failing to produce thrust. There is an ongoing debate among physicists whether or not a jet-fueled rocket can work in space, and simple experiments can be done to demonstrate that such a thing is not possible. If you take a balloon attached to a straw with a string running through that straw to allow for its propulsion, then you take a piece of paper and place it at the nozzle of the balloon to recreate a vacuum, you will see that the balloon will not be propelled forward when you release the nozzle. The air escaping from the nozzle will not have anything to push off of and the balloon will remain stationary. This leads me to conclude that 1) There is no vacuum of outer space 2) NASA lies and they have never traveled beyond earth’s atmosphere, and 3) The earth is flat

PLANCK SATELLITE DATA CONFIRMS GEOCENTRICITY
In March of 2013 the results from observations recorded over 50 years from the Planck Satellite determined that earth is in fact at the center of the Universe. Cosmic Microwave Background Data was used to map hot and cold spots in the universe giving them a center, also known as “the Axis of Evil” because of all the damage it does to scientists’ theories. They found a correlation with the plane of the earth around the sun, which places the earth dead center in the universe, and putting an end to the Copernican Principle.

They are currently working on “new physics” as we speak, in an attempt to explain it away. On the Planck mission website Professor Efstathiou states:
“Our ultimate goal would be to construct a new model that predicts the anomalies and links them together. But these are early days; so far, we don’t know whether this is possible and what type of new physics might be needed. And that’s exciting”
Exciting indeed. That’s how science works apparently. When data is found that disproves their heliocentric model, they just come up with new math and new theories to fit the lies.

GYROSCOPES
The only way a gyroscopic navigational system can work is on a flat, stationary earth. A gyroscope will stay perfectly upright relative to its starting position. Mechanical gyroscopes are used in all commercial airliners, with an artificial horizon attached which is held constant by the gyroscope so pilots can remain on course during their flight. It would be impossible for the artificial horizon to remain constant while the gyroscope does not as the plane flies over the curvature of the earth, yet this is what we are asked to believe.

The gyroscopes used in commercial airlines are completely mechanical, so there are no electronic adjustments. A simple experiment using a gyroscope right in your own living room can be done to prove that the earth is not a spinning ball. If we live on a ball the inclination of the ground where we stand will change over time as the globe spins, but the gyroscope will not follow, so you should be able to measure this change in orientation of the gyroscope over a portion of time. We are told that Michel Foucault used the gyroscope to measure the rotation of the earth in 1852, however this experiment has never resulted in the observance of any procession in a gyroscope by anyone who has tried it themselves.

THE ARCTIC MIDNIGHT SUN
The Arctic Midnight Sun proves that we do not live on a globe. During the summer solstice, from the 65th parallel up, we see that the sun never sets for days in this region. Instead it simply rises and falls every 12 hours but never passes below the horizon. If the earth were a globe, orbiting the sun, the only place we could possibly see such a thing would be at the North or South pole. Regardless of any tilt or inclination, any other vantage point, from 89 degrees latitude downward, could never see the sun for 24 hours straight. A quarter of Finland's territory lies north of the Arctic Circle and at the country's northernmost point the sun does not set at all for 60 days during summer. This is simply impossible if we live on a globe. In order to see the midnight sun from anywhere besides the poles on a globe you would have to be looking through miles of land and sea in order to see the sun through an entire revolution of the earth. Also, why is it that the midnight sun is never seen in the south during the southern summer? If we do live on a globe, such a thing should occur.

NO OBSERVABLE NOR MEASURABLE CURVATURE

Nowhere on earth do we see any curvature, although many will tell you that they have seen this curve, some even just from a hilltop. But what many mistake for curvature in video and pictures is the effect of a fisheye lens, which distorts the images. If you think you are seeing curvature out of the window of a plane it is because the windows of an airplane are designed with small holes which regulate air pressure causing them to become convex at high altitude and essentially become a fisheye lens. So, not only do we not see any curvature, we also have never measured the curvature anywhere on earth. The Pythagorean Theorem is used to measure the amount of curve there is to a sphere.

This equation states that for a sphere with a circumference of 24,901 miles, the amount of curvature is 8 inches times the number of miles squared. Using this equation, we have found that many landmarks which should fall significantly below the curvature of the earth are clearly visible. The Chicago Skyline as seen from Lake Michigan over 50 miles away is one example. Where I live here on the island of Kauai in the Hawaiian Island chain we can see the peak of Mt. Ka’ala on the adjacent island of Oahu. It is 108 miles from the center of Oahu to the center of Kauai and on a clear day you can see Oahu from Kauai with the naked eye when the island should fall below the curvature of the earth. Boats being able to see light houses from great distances is yet another example. If we live on a ball, where is the curve?

PARALLAX

Scientists tell us that the earth is spinning just over 1,000 mph at the equator while our planet orbits the sun at 67,000 mph, and the entire solar system shoots through space at over 500,000 mph. We are expected to believe that despite all this motion at astronomical speeds, the constellations have not changed in thousands of years?

Day after day, year after year the North star, Polaris, remains fixed and all of the stars maintain their positions. When you look at the issue of parallax and what we observe in the sky, you can see that it is impossible for us to view the stars as we do year-round if we live on a spinning ball flying through space. If you hold your finger out in front of you and look at it with one eye closed, when you close that eye and open the other you will see a shift in position of your finger. The same should be true for the constellations as we make our yearly circuit around the sun. When observing a particular star in January the stars that sit behind it should shift in orientation when we view that same star in July, because the angle at which we are viewing said star should have shifted dramatically as we make our way around the sun. However, we never observe any such parallax.

The further you research what modern science has taught us about our world and the universe, you will discover numerous paradoxes and theories that make no sense and contradict reality. For example, we are told that 0.5% of the known universe is made up of stars and planets; that which is visible, while 27% is dark matter and 68% consists of dark energy. We are told that dark matter bends light and if this is true how is it possible for us to see the 0.5% of stars and planets through this invisible light bending matter? Even more contradictory is the notion that dark energy expands space faster than the speed of light. If this is true, how is it that we can see light from stars trillions of miles away when the space between us and those stars is expanding faster than light?

Seeing that the earth is not a spinning globe just takes being open minded enough to question everything you think you know. When you first hear about it, of course the idea that the earth could be flat seems ridiculous, because that is the reaction we have been programmed to have regarding such a thing, but if you take the time to do the research, the evidence speaks for itself.