The matter of "real images of Earth from space has long been an area of contention between skeptics and believers of the heliocentric model.
The Himawari Satellite photos have been cited by ball believers as the "proof" of such "real" images. This video discusses the official Himari websites listed below, which upon closer investigation seem to be pointing more in the direction of the "official" Himiwari images being composites, similar the ones NASA uses.
So I guess, as skeptics have been mentioning for some time now, we're all still waiting for those glorious "real" images of Earth from space, .... maybe next year. :)
LINKS DESCRIBED IN VIDEO
ftp://ftp.nnvl.noaa.gov/
ftp://ftp.nnvl.noaa.gov/SiteDescription.txt
ftp://ftp.nnvl.noaa.gov/GOES/HIMAWARI/
> Paul on the Plane <
Thank you for posting this. Important information. @ironshield
I have to wonder if this pic above isn't a CGI then who or what was in space to capture this perspective?
What the earth isn't a globe? You're telling me its flat! Why then can I see the curvature of water here?
Seems like you got some explaining to do. Oh and you can go see this for yourself. Don't shill out money to globebusters when you can go get the evidence for yourself. See the truth! The earth isn't flat. The universe is flat!
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/degrees-of-freedom/httpblogsscientificamericancomdegrees-of-freedom20110725what-do-you-mean-the-universe-is-flat-part-i/
The water isn't curving - an aerial view of that location indicates those towers are not in a straight line.
Not true at all. Dr. Zach used Google earth, which is not an aerial view, and he used the wrong towers in his rebuttal (go check the summary of his video. He admits this). The towers ARE straight. And, when you do an aerial view, the distance to the horizon is increased and you can see more of the towers... which means, by definition, they did not disappear due to perspective.
Here's the aerial view. Straight as an arrow.
and here are the towers at different elevations. Increased distance can be observed, measured, and predicted, and repeated and is falsifiable but not falsified (in other words, science) on a globe model, and unexplainable on a flat earth. In other words, this is a perfect illustration of water curving. And, in fact, every time you go up in altitude and see further, that is evidence of the earth's curvature.
One thing that good science requires is a thorough review of the current studies on any particular subject. Even Dr. Zach admits he used the wrong towers in his video, so using his video claims as evidence of a rebuttal to this being curvature is poor science... scientism, if you will. If you are going to make claims that the globe model is based on scientism, and therefore wrong, then it would require your rebuttals to be made from a position of science, and not scientism, for them to be credible.
Try an aerial view of the entire stretch. They are not in a straight line, and the pics you are showing are misleading.
I just showed you that they are in a straight line. They are not misleading, the last one is simple an aerial pic. You cannot say and have not shown or given any evidence of why actual images of the power lines ARE or even could be misleading.