RE: Spinning Around The Coriolis Effect - Proving A Round World Without NASA
Another theory is that the air is dragged along by the sun (flat earth and gravity)
This is not a theory it is a hypothesis and very easy to disprove. Set up a camera above a roundabout and you and a friend sit opposite each other. Then throw a ball back and forth and you will see that it travels in a straight line.
Then set the roundabout spinning and throw the ball to each other, now when you check the balls path on the camera afterwords, you will see that the ball curves in order to travel the straight line distance between you and your friend.
If the sun or gravity had anything to do with it, the same curve would be visible when you're at rest, which of course it isn't.
Another theory is that the air is pushed along by the sun (aether, electric universe)
Another theory is that there is a jet stream configuration that causes it. (won't really know until something big happens that really changes the jet streams)
See experiment above to disprove these hypotheses.
The direction that water swirls down a drain has much more to do with slight irregularities in the drain then the Coriolis Effect.
I covered this in the article, which is why the experiment is done with the raised kids pool; watch the video and they cover this. Even in a still body of water, the Coriolis effect is apparent.
Storms are large structures of wind/pressure formation. The effect only has to apply a little torque to get them to turn. Water swirling down a drain is much tinier and denser. The effect is almost negligible on the scale of the pool.
Also covered in the video, the effect is tiny and noticeable in both hemispheres of the planet.
If the Coriolis effect actually effected drain swirl direction, we would have easily made a perpetual motion machine based on the effect.
This statement (along with almost all the others you've made) highlights your lack of knowledge about physics. Water swirling down a drain would not create a perpetual motion machine because of the amount of energy used to get it to do that in the first place, far outweighs the output.
This is because of the loss of energy largely due to friction, there are various devices in use today which use falling water as an energy source quite successfully, however none are perpetual motion because of the reasons stated above.
As I said to you in a previous post, you need to educate yourself, which you can do very cheaply online. Then you need to do some experiments, if the earth is flat it is provable using the scientific method. Why don't you make a video like the one I posted, which proves your various hypotheses?
You will win the Nobel prize for physics if you came up with an experiment that proves just one of these way out ideas.
I await with bated breath...
This seems to be your go to statement. I would suggest you stop using it.
You are mistaking knowledge and rhetoric. It appears that you believe that if I went to physics class, then I would be brain washed like you. And therefor, I wouldn't argue with you about these theories that are assumed as facts in all of the science classes.
As an example, all of your counters to the theories above are all of the form, well this theory based on this theory disproves your theory.
i.e. we are on a spinning ball, thus the analogy of throwing a ball on a marry-go-round disproves the flat earth Coriolis Effect theory. You do understand that many of the flat earth people believe the earth is not moving? And so, you are using a theory of a theory (the earth is a ball, and thus, it spins to create day/night) to disprove a theory.
That isn't a disproof, that is an "I like these theories better" statement.
And your statement about not creating a perpetual motion machine shows your lack of understanding of physics. If there was enough torque to cause the spin of water in a kiddie pool, then all we have to do is create a large enough wheel so that the torque of the Coriolis Effect overcomes the friction of the bearing and the wheel will spin forever.
I have told you many times that I do not believe in the ball earth or the flat earth. So, why would I do that?
I also have serious issues with the scientific method. But, I am sure you meant to say that you want an experiment that can be repeated by yourself.
Well then stop saying really stupid things...
Anyway I'm just going to stop talking to you now, you're the sort of person who I could show that it was daytime out of the window, and you'd simply say, no it's night, daytime is just a theory.
By the way, if you think you can create, or even demonstrate a perpetual motion machine using falling, spinning water. Then do it; and have fun spending the $1,000,000 Nobel Prize fund, because you'd be a shoe in to win it.
Oh and have you read the theory that says the Flat Earth conspiracy is just a false flag to make conspiracy theorists look stupid? (I don't need an answer to that question)
Anyways, have fun living in your fantasy land, whatever the shape you think the earth is, and I will have fun being brainwashed by reality :-)
Toodle pip!
Cg
That is too, too funny.
If there was actually any torque to the Coriolis effect, why would I use falling water? Just apply the torque straight to a wheel. It is the theory you have been arguing towards all this time.
Yes, I have read the theory that the flat earth theory is a psy-op.
However, have you read my replies that state I am not a flat-earther?
And I will offer you $10 SBD.
I didn't list all of the other theories for the Coriolis Effect.
I will offer you 10 SBD if you reply with any of the other major theories.
how about this site:
https://www.jewelerstoolsmall.com