RE: Spinning Around The Coriolis Effect - Proving A Round World Without NASA
This statement (along with almost all the others you've made) highlights your lack of knowledge about physics.
This seems to be your go to statement. I would suggest you stop using it.
Well then stop saying really stupid things...
Anyway I'm just going to stop talking to you now, you're the sort of person who I could show that it was daytime out of the window, and you'd simply say, no it's night, daytime is just a theory.
By the way, if you think you can create, or even demonstrate a perpetual motion machine using falling, spinning water. Then do it; and have fun spending the $1,000,000 Nobel Prize fund, because you'd be a shoe in to win it.
Oh and have you read the theory that says the Flat Earth conspiracy is just a false flag to make conspiracy theorists look stupid? (I don't need an answer to that question)
Anyways, have fun living in your fantasy land, whatever the shape you think the earth is, and I will have fun being brainwashed by reality :-)
Toodle pip!
That is too, too funny.
If there was actually any torque to the Coriolis effect, why would I use falling water? Just apply the torque straight to a wheel. It is the theory you have been arguing towards all this time.
Yes, I have read the theory that the flat earth theory is a psy-op.
However, have you read my replies that state I am not a flat-earther?
And I will offer you $10 SBD.
I didn't list all of the other theories for the Coriolis Effect.
I will offer you 10 SBD if you reply with any of the other major theories.
how about this site:
https://www.jewelerstoolsmall.com