Final Countdown? Navy footage released from the Pentagon of an encounter between a Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet and an unknown object. including one of a whitish oval object, chased by fighter jets from the aircraft carrier Nimitz in 2004.
See a video report on this here,
FINAL COUNTDOWN NAVY FOOTAGE SHOWING UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL VEHICLES WILL FULL DISCLOSURE COME?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tCVyeym2Hsyz/
ARE PEOPLE READY FOR THE REVEAL? ONLY THEY CAN ANSWER THAT.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TM8LVPBJMZrX/
Senate Intel Committee votes to require the Pentagon to release report on UFOs
Pentagon studying UFO's for more than a decade or longer?
See more video footage and evidence at the bottom above Sources.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-harry-reid-navy.html
Despite Pentagon statements that it disbanded a once-covert program to investigate unidentified flying objects, the effort remains underway — renamed and tucked inside the Office of Naval Intelligence, where officials continue to study mystifying encounters between military pilots and unidentified aerial vehicles.
Does this remind you of something?
Philadelphia Experiment, Montauk Project, Plum Pudding Island, JFK saves the Day! Missing ships, some cut in half, WHAT? Who in the World is Charles Dellschau and what were his connections to people and secret Aero Clubs? Prt 1
Also at the end of The Called. . .the Makings of a Perfect Day note what Juan calls his dog!
TOO LATE TO APOLOGIZE! THE CALLED MAKINGS OF A PERFECT DAY
https://www.bitchute.com/video/E0mhZgvd6Rkr/
See the entire movie here, well worth the watch!
"THE CALLED - MAKINGS OF A PERFECT DAY" JUAN O SAVIN
https://www.bitchute.com/video/aVS6tpc2y14d/
Back to the New York Times article from July 23, 2020
Pentagon officials will not discuss the program, which is not classified but deals with classified matters. Yet it appeared last month in a Senate committee report outlining spending on the nation’s intelligence agencies for the coming year. The report said the program, the Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon Task Force, was “to standardize collection and reporting” on sightings of unexplained aerial vehicles, and was to report at least some of its findings to the public within 180 days after passage of the intelligence authorization act.
You can find it here from a simple search on duck duck go
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3905/text
While retired officials involved with the effort — including Harry Reid, the former Senate majority leader — hope the program will seek evidence of vehicles from other worlds, its main focus is on discovering whether another nation, especially any potential adversary, is using breakout aviation technology that could threaten the United States.
Senator Marco Rubio, the Florida Republican who is the acting chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, told a CBS affiliate in Miami this month that he was primarily concerned about reports of unidentified aircraft over American military bases — and that it was in the government’s interest to find out who was responsible.
He expressed concerns that China or Russia or some other adversary had made “some technological leap” that “allows them to conduct this sort of activity.”
Interesting!
Under 13min. with many tells and reveals in here.
T'S BEEN A LONG ROAD! THE MONTAUK CONNECTION! HAVE YOU SEEN THE SCRIPT?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/LCKnqgVFMJ47/
Mr. Rubio said some of the unidentified aerial vehicles over U.S. bases possibly exhibited technologies not in the American arsenal. But he also noted: “Maybe there is a completely, sort of, boring explanation for it. But we need to find out.”
In 2017, The New York Times disclosed the existence of a predecessor unit, called the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. Defense Department officials said at the time that the unit and its $22 million in funding had lapsed after 2012.
Footage from the New York Times seen here where they are spotted,
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/16/us/politics/pentagon-program-ufo-harry-reid.html
Here are some clips if you have trouble accessing
Footage shows it rotating
What did other presidents have to say?
From May 22, 2021 on NBC News
Biden Laughs Off Question About UFOs At Press Conference
Obama talking about UFOs.
Intelligence Authorization Act
Naval Intelligence must standardize collection and reporting on UAP for fiscal year 2021.
There is a specific request from an intelligence senate committee for the DNI that a report be submitted within 180 days of the enactment of the Act.
The Unidentified Aerial Phenomena are also known as anomalous aerial vehicles.
Is the timeline June of 2021?
Will it be highly redacted?
Obama was asked about the issue of UFOs during an interview on Tuesday, the former president confirming “footage and records” of unidentified objects exist.
Much of the newfound, and newly sincere, interest in UFOs, this week appears to stem from a report on CBS’s 60 Minutes on Sunday, which tackled “the US government’s grudging acknowledgment” of UFOs.
Obama was asked about the issue of UFOs during an interview on Tuesday, the former president confirming “footage and records” of unidentified objects exist.
Much of the newfound, and newly sincere, interest in UFOs, this week appears to stem from a report on CBS’s 60 Minutes on Sunday, which tackled “the US government’s grudging acknowledgment” of UFOs.
Obama was asked about the issue of UFOs during an interview on Tuesday, the former president confirming “footage and records” of unidentified objects exist.
Much of the newfound, and newly sincere, interest in UFOs, this week appears to stem from a report on CBS’s 60 Minutes on Sunday, which tackled “the US government’s grudging acknowledgment” of UFOs.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/may/20/ufo-obama-cbs-60-minutes-america-aliens
“What is true, and I’m actually being serious here, is that there’s footage and records of objects in the skies, that we don’t know exactly what they are, we can’t explain how they moved, their trajectory,” Obama told CBS.
https://wgntv.com/news/barack-obama-talks-about-ufos-again-on-late-night-television/
On Monday, O’Neal shared his experience of seeing a “flying saucer” with ABC, while CNN interviewed a former combat pilot who told of how she had spotted a UFO off the coast of San Diego.
The interest in UFOs will probably only grow as the US prepares to release its report at the beginning of June. In March John Ratcliffe, Donald Trump’s former intelligence director, said the disclosure would reveal that there have been “a lot more” sightings of UFOs than have been made public.
EXCLUSIVE - Ex Pentagon official Luis Elizondo reveals UFO bombshells | The Basement Office
EXCLUSIVE - (Part 2) Ex Pentagon official Luis Elizondo reveals UFO bombshells | The Basement Office
what was your main objective at atip
00:28
well it was to to collect and analyze
00:30
and try to assess
00:32
what the things were that were incurring
00:34
into we were encountering in controlled
00:37
u.s airspace
00:38
these were things that weren't ours uh
00:41
we had no idea who they belonged to and
00:43
frankly were displaying beyond next
00:45
generation technology
00:47
for that reason we decided to stick with
00:49
two fundamental questions
00:50
what is it and how does it work and
00:53
figured if we could make some progress
00:54
even in one of those areas
00:56
that would be considered a victory for
00:58
where is it from what are the intentions
01:03
who's behind the wheel and
01:05
and what not what is it how does it work
01:08
did you come to any uh conclusions or at
01:11
least a best current assessment
01:12
regarding either of those
01:15
uh we did with one of them
01:18
we we had some very very smart people
01:21
scientifically focused individuals with
01:23
incredible and impeccable credentials
01:25
come up with some very interesting
01:26
theories and uh
01:29
you know to to the best of our knowledge
01:30
that we actually may be a little bit
01:33
closer understanding
01:34
some of the physics and and how so what
01:36
it is we still don't know but
01:38
i think we are we are well underway
01:41
on a path of figuring out how it works
01:44
and what are the physics involved.
five
01:50
fundamental observables that when put
01:52
into totality of this this
01:54
phenomenon really help us appreciate
01:57
why this is something that is that is
02:00
certainly not our own technology
To change direction very rapidly
The average human being can sustain 9G forces for only a short time before experiencing negative biological consequences like redouts and blackouts.
The F-16 can experience 17G's before you have structural failure like the wings snapping off.
The observed Unidentified Aerial Phenomena are doing up to 600 G's.
One g is the force per unit mass due to gravity at the Earth's surface and is the standard gravity (symbol: gn), defined as 9.806 65 metres per second squared, or equivalently 9.806 65 newtons of force per kilogram of mass.
From Sandboxx
G-forces don’t translate to the big screen, or to video games, but they are a major aspect of flying fighters. Movies like Top Gun show the characters easily moving around the cockpit while chatting on the radio during a dogfight. In reality, during a sharp turn under peak G, you’re spending the majority of your effort pancaked into your seat, trying not to pass out.
Right now, as you’re reading this, you’re probably at 1G, or one time the force of gravity. Your weight is what you see when you stand on a scale. I weigh approximately 200 pounds, 230 with my gear on. For most people, the peak G-force they’ve experienced is probably on a rollercoaster during a loop—which is about 3-4G’s. It’s enough to push your head down and pin your arms by your side. Modern fighters like the F-16 and F-35 pull 9G’s, which translates to over 2,000 pounds on my body.
https://www.sandboxx.us/blog/g-forces-and-fighter-pilots-whats-it-like-to-pull-9gs/
Those speeds at mach 5 or above.
For normal and dry conditions and temperature of 68 degrees F, this is 768 mph, 343 m/s, 1,125 ft/s, 667 knots, or 1,235 km/h.
We do have some aircraft that can do that some shuttles and missiles that in order to escape velocity would have to go much faster than that.
The SR-71 Blackbird when going 3,200 mph. . .if it wanted to take a left hand turn, it would take about half of the state of Ohio to do so.
Yet the UAF seen are doing 8,9,10,11,000 miles per hour in our low atmosphere, yet are able to do these crazy right angle turns.
This wasn't just seen, but was also calculated through radar data.
Data going back historically for decades have clocked these objects going 13, 14, 15,000 MPH not just by one radar, but multiple radars.
Billions of dollars are spent on a single B-2 bomber, just so it is more difficult to see on radar, and you can still see it with the naked eye fairly easily.
Yet pilots that are trained observers are saying they say it, but don't know how to describe it because it doesn't look like anything they had.
No. . .
Wings
Cockpits
Tails
Rivets
ailerons [An aileron (French for "little wing" or "fin") is a hinged flight control surface usually forming part of the trailing edge of each wing of a fixed-wing aircraft.]
Elevators
None of the above, yet. ..There it IS!
A rocket ship which spends most of it's time in a vacuum environment,
a jet engine and wings are useless
What it has is a chemical rocket engine and thrusters to maneuver in space.
Compare this to a submarine which is not a rocket because it is under water and has a propeller to mechanically displace water and it uses buoyancy to go up and down.
Whenever we try to make a vehicle to operate in multiple environments, multiple domains. . .there's always a design compromise.
For instance, a seaplane can fly and float. . . it's neither a Very Good plane or boat, it's a compromise.
Yet these unidentified aerial phenomena are able to operate in our
- atmosphere both low earth and high up earth atmosphere
- low orbit
- and seemingly underwater
without compromising any of their design characteristics or performance parameters which is very significant.
The last observable. . .
Positive lift or anti gravity
There are only three fundamental ways we know in a classical sense how to defy earth's gravity.
Through flight where you have four fundamental forces
- thrust
- lift
- drive
- weight
When one knows how to manipulate those you have flight as in an airplane.
Another way to defy earth's gravity is through sheer ballistics.
Glow something with enough energy out of a tube, where it will go up.
for example, a mortar with the high arcing trajectories,
throwing a baseball
an icbm [intercontinental ballistic missile]
These will go up, then eventually go back down.
The last way we know how to defy earth's gravity is through "lighter than air."
think of a hot air balloon
helium
hydrogen
Where the air density inside is less than the air density outside so it floats and rises.
These unidentified aerial phenomena have no wings, no flight propulsion, they don't look like anything we have. . .
yet somehow they are able to defy earth's gravity.
So when you have All of those observables being displayed by a single technology. . .
Navy footage from 2004 and 2015
You begin to realize very quickly that is a paradigm shift in relation to what we are used to dealing with and the knowledge base of civilians.
There is a significant amount of data which far surpasses the sightings people are aware of.
This information and data comes in on a regular basis.
This isn't anecdotal information from the Nimitz, Roosevelt, the kid.
They occur all the time. Some are just hearing about these incidents, they haven't ever stopped.
Many think there are only 3 major incidents and some videos, but that is what they know of, they are not aware what all is actually out there and how numerous the sightings really are or why the information and evidence pertaining to them has been quashed.
Sometimes there are moments of a lot of activity and sometimes there isn't.
It is about weekly and definitely safe to say on a monthly basis.
A theory in the DoD is that these UAP could be originating from the earth's oceans.
Luis Elizonda believes that is possible due to the fact that we know very little about our oceans and these UAP seem to be around water a lot.
Every time we ascribe a quality of what life should be like photosynthesis. . .nature proves us wrong.
Just look at chemosynthesis and the life that exists in the very deepest parts of our ocean where black smokers live.
Life is typically sparse on the deep seafloor, where organisms endure high pressure, near-freezing temperatures and pitch-black darkness. But at certain spots on the ocean floor where tectonic plates meet, unique ecosystems teem with unusual animal species. There, mineral-laden fluid is emitted either as a warm (5-100 degrees Celsius/41-212 degrees Fahrenheit), diffuse flow from seabed cracks or as plumes of superheated water (250-400 degrees Celsius/482-752 degrees Fahrenheit) from chimney-like structures. These structures are referred to as hydrothermal vents, and the assortment of animals surrounding them are referred to as hydrothermal vent communities. When first discovered in the 1970s, these oases in the deep sea were a complete surprise—Dr. Bob Ballard calls them a far more important discovery than his finding of the wreck of the Titanic!
The animals are spectacular, but often overlooked are the organisms that make these ecosystems possible: the microbes that convert the mineral-laden fluid into energy.
Most bacteria and archaea cannot survive in the superheated hydrothermal fluids of the chimneys or “black smokers.” But hydrothermal microorganisms are able to thrive just outside the hottest waters, in the temperature gradients that form between the hot venting fluid and cold seawater. These microbes are the foundation for life in hydrothermal vent ecosystems. Instead of using light energy to turn carbon dioxide into sugar like plants do, they harvest chemical energy from the minerals and chemical compounds that spew from the vents—a process known as chemosynthesis. These compounds—such as hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen gas, ferrous iron and ammonia—lack carbon. The microbes release new compounds after chemosynthesis, some of which are toxic, but others can be taken in nutritionally by other organisms.
Chemical-harvesting microorganisms are found in different habitats all over the world, and they are essential to the hydrothermal vent ecosystem. Like plants and algae on land and in shallow waters, the vent microbes are the primary producers in their food web and are eaten by larger animals.
These next two photos go together for the actual depth.
See more here,
https://ocean.si.edu/ecosystems/deep-sea/microbes-keep-hydrothermal-vents-pumping
That life is very much alive and yet it doesn't rely on photosynthesis the way we do up here.
The fact that we know so very little about our oceans, it has to be kept as an option that UAP could be originating from there.
Could there be congruencies between water and UAP activity?
Anecdotally there appears to be a relationship there.
There are many verified cases above, near or under the water involving these UAP.
A theory regarding UAP and their relationship to water
We will pick this up in the next article.
FINAL COUNTDOWN NAVY FOOTAGE SHOWING UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL VEHICLES WILL FULL DISCLOSURE COME?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tCVyeym2Hsyz/