Trump & Weinstein as icons of the feminist movement

In the latest years, there's been an increasing battage in favour of women gender as a whole, in what many women point out to be a male chauvinist society.
Many prominent female figures (singers, actresses, first ladies, etc..) have sustained a forced gender equality, with no biological foundation at all.
They claim more women in the labor force, regardless of the working sector; they claim equalization to men salaries, for the sane working places, regardless of their productivity.
They claim not to be regarded by men as beautiful alone, cause that is told to be a sexist comment.
But, at the same time, they ask for male protection against sexual offenses; they pretend not to be even gently touched by men, cause that would be perceived by many of them as an assault; they pretend not to be told that men are much more suitable for many job roles, especially the ones implying physical strength or capabilities, while at the same time asking to compete separately in whatever sport, so admitting their lower physical strength/capabilities.
Many of them have even gotten to the point of sustaining women are more suitable to be in charge of certain public roles, just because they are women.
Many of them, every single day, bomb us, telling
how they are better off at whatever intellectual discipline, either regarding human or social sciences, or scientific ones.
Giant Corps are censoring in Every way, even by firing, any kind of internal dissent: one of the latest cases to come up in the news, was the case of a Google software engineering who was brave enough to internally talk about the fact that men are much batter off than women in software development tasks.
Beforehand, a few years ago, there has been the much talked upon case of Larry Summers, at the time President of Harvard, who dared say men are better off than women in scientific disciplines: because of that declaration, even if his apologies followed up instantly, due to media high pressure on the matter, he was fired from the position he was in charge of, replaced by a woman.
Very strong pressure has Also been put forward by singers as well as actresses: first Madonna, thb Lady Gaga, have claimed to having been sexually abused many years before they have become famous. Lady Gaga has even written a song on the matter, named "Till it happens to you".
In the actresses field, Robin Wright and Jennifer Lawrence were just two of the Joan of Arch piooners in the struggle to pretend from Hollywood producers and filmmakers, an engagement parification to the one of the men colleagues they were working with, from time to time.
But, the most disgusting part of the whole new feminist movement, has been displayed in the recent US elections, where Trump was opposed to Clinton.
Many internationally recognized characters of the so called new feminist movement, have claimed that Clinton was the only candidate who could come to replace Obama as President of the US, with the pretense She was the only one defending the rights of self-claiming minorities, women, black people, latinos, and the LGBT community.
But, how much hypocrisy was in all this strong push for Clinton's campaign, against Trump, whi was pointed out as a sexist, racist, homophobe, xenophobe, candidate?!?
She was the one who married Bill Clinton, a world renown sexual harasser, whose relation with Hillary has just been in favor of the media, while She had been living with her partner for many years till Now, pretending to be heterosexual, and standing against the so called "rights equality" for LGBT people.
She was the one, whose husband was the one who theorized the so called "Don't ask, don't tell" policy, regarding gay coming out in the US militare forces.
She was the one whose campaign was massively supported by Islamic Monarchies & Theocracies, such as Saudi Arabia, The UAE and the Islamic Republic of Iran.
In all the above mentioned countries, gays are legally prosecuted, jailed and even executed for their sexual orientation.
In all the above mentioned countries, talking of women liberties is almost a paradox: women adultery is often punished, in full obedience to the Shaaría Law, with adulter stoned to death in a public place.
In all the above mentioned countries, liberty ti profess any religion apart from Islam, is at least opposed, when not legally forbidden and prosecuted.
In all the above mentioned countries, girls have not the Right to be granted an Education, and they are considered as a property, to pass from their dads' hands, to their promised husbands' ones (chosen by the pater familias).
In all the above mentioned countries, for a woman, it is not even thinkable to hang out with female friends all alone, with no men; to hang out not fully covered by a Burqa, or a Niqab; to do whatever they would enjoy, without the granted permission of the man they are owned by.
Nonetheless, in the so much praised US, Hillary Clinton has been shown by mainstream media, as a female, LGBT, Afro-American, Latinos, nero, while Trump has been appointed to be a sexist, homophobe, White suprematist, not much different from a New Millennium, Hitler.
So, the question is: why so many women, gays, trans, black people and latinos voted for Trump?
It's all very straightforward: because he stood explicitly for self-defense, autodetermination, and was not finaced by any Liberty-oppressing country. Nonetheless, he never showed to be an hypocrit as Hillary proved to be: what he were to say in public speeches, was exactly what he would have said in his private daily life.
So, what else is needed to be said? In a next article, we'll continue the feminist movement hard critics, in relation to The Weinstein Case!!