RE: Thoughts on "Impossible" Beauty Standards and Their Origin
Do you truly believe that society has nothing to do with it, though?
My point? Just this: Neither "society" nor the "patriarchy" hold people in general, or women in particular, to unrealistic or impossible beauty standards. Evolution does so.
I think it's a combination of both...
And yet these same feminists irrationally insist that the "average" heterosexual woman's desire to be wanted by the opposite sex, and to compulsively appeal to its sexual preferences (that is, to male society's "beauty standards"), is NOT a genetic predisposition but is instead a product of cultural conditioning and male dominance--of the "patriarchy" or "rape culture".
Also, just an observation. It kinda seems like you're blaming societal pressures on feminists, instead of evolution, based on how much you use the term "traditional feminists" in your own counter-arguments.
Society has something to do with it, but much less than feminists suggest (meaning that we can't solve the "problem" simply by reforming society). From the book Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters:
To the extent I'm "blaming" anybody, I blame men for conning and shaming women into ceding their sexual power. My frustration with traditional feminists (as opposed to more modern sex positive ones) is that they aid and abet men in this task.
My whole point is that evolutionary programming NOT a "societal pressure", rather it's a natural, internal urge. So, it would be inappropriate for me to "blame" evolution for "societal pressures". To the extent societal pressures are to blame for anything, it's for conning/shaming women into doing other than what they are biologically programmed to do, creating much societal strife and personal angst.