You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Conflict Of Interest: The Politics Of CPS
Clearly there is some need for an agency to see that children aren't abused
how well has that worked out so far?
Clearly there is some need for an agency to see that children aren't abused
how well has that worked out so far?
Not well at all, it’s far beyond what parents envisaged in all negatives.
pretty typical of almost anything government involves itself in?
You are right, pretty typical. The effects of this system is much much higher in pure devious practices
I also note that there is need for people to protect children, but that agencies are not people.
We don't need agencies, we need people working together.
Thanks!
I'm thinking something non-governmental (no libturds and money grubbing shysters) maybe a religious organization.
I almost hate to point this out, but religious organizations haven't a better record of protecting children than CPS.
My take away from history is that people themselves, even those who are religious, can work together without statist force, to help children.
While even families can be vectors for abuse, as you have experienced, they are the least likely vector for abuse, and families working together with their peers can probably best help themselves to protect their children.
I'd be opposed to creating institutions such as those run by church or state, or empowering those presently extant, to be more involved in protecting children.
It's Cultural Marxists... they've infiltrated all facets of society, governmental and non!
we have that in FL, its called Lutheran Services, They're just as bad as the rest but they are the product of a broken system. We need a reboot
It's Cultural Marxists... they've infiltrated all facets of society, governmental and non!