You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Can the Scientific Community Better Respond to 'Fake News' in Science?
Indistinguishable angenically not indistinguishable. The only thing full of crap here is what you are posting.
Indistinguishable angenically not indistinguishable. The only thing full of crap here is what you are posting.
If it is distinguishable then show exactly how they distinguish it, because:
Don't try to play word games, it says it right there, and don't try to speak out of your ass about stuff that clearly you don't have knowledge of.
The hint that they are bogus/full of crap is the blue text on the right side: Hard to distinguish, but offer no methodology about exactly what the mechanism is to distinguish between the two if it isn't antigenic.
The other part is the discrepancy of 3-40%.. another bullshit statistic derived without sources which yells bullshit/we don't know but we assume.