Facebook Chief Mark Zuckerberg worth $62.4B. He’s now the third wealthiest person of 2017. How about you?
Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg once again beat out Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, finishing with $62.4 billion — $7 billion more than Ellison’s $52.4 billion. Zuckerberg is the third-wealthiest person on this year’s list. Source: MSN.comCongratulation to Mark Zuckerberg for making a lot of money from Authors and Curators on it's platform.
The question is. Have you earn any money when you post, like or comment using Facebook or any other social network like SnapChat, Instagram? How about your followers? I don't think so.
Stop wasting your time and resources using Facebook, join SteemIt.com and create your account. Start making money with your stories, pictures, do it yourself project, fashion, etc., and bring your network of friends with you so they can make money as well.
Time is money, don't waste it. For more information check, Hardworking.com web page.
Photo by TechCrunch
Source: https://que.com/facebook-chief-mark-zuckerberg-worth-62-4b-hes-now-the-third-wealthiest-person-of-2017/
Follow me @Yehey, Vote Up and Resteem
Thank you.
Can't wait to see you @yehey posting your first $bi here on Steemit :) Even if that's not the main point of steemit, It is always good to know that I am being paid to learn from people's posts and to share my knowledge with others.
Baby steps my friend. I attained $1K, my next goal is, $2K, $5K, $10K, then $20K and so on ... If possible $1B why not.
Follow me @Yehey
Thank you.
Probably use some of that coin to buy Steemit.
I've used the article to convince my network of friends to come join me here at Steemit.com. Hopefully this article will be a perfect way to finally persuade them.
Wish me luck,
@Yehey
Just so ya'll know.... STEEM is a threat to him... https://steemit.com/memechallenge/@chuckypita/meme-challenge-23-entry-1
That's funny. Would be nice if you use Mark K. in the photo instead a different actor. The message delivery will be more appealing.
Thank you for checking in.
@Yehey
Yeah - it was part of a Meme challenge - the point is, he just sold $35 million worth of stock... coincidence? If STEEM continues to pick up users, which you and I both expect they will, who do you think it's going to hurt the most?
I'm still convincing hard some of my friends to join me here, it seems my wallet is not fat enough to bring them over. I will try again next month, maybe I will be able to double up.
Keep in touch,
@Yehey
Good post, upvoted and followed!
Cheers to you as always.
Mark probably has teams of people mining steemit as we speak just so he has power in the future. haha
To really beat FB, steemit must provide an easy way to upload photo for friends and private access.
It is just a matter of time.
@yehey
Just drag the photo from your computer to the post you are writing and it's uploaded... Ahahahhahahahha, don't tell me you didn't knew about this ?
I know that feature from the Desktop. The questions is how to make it private "for your eyes only" or through friends (followers) access only. You know what I mean right?
And mobile steemit still need a lot of improvement. It's really hard to steemit using smart phones.
Cheers.
@yehey
The only thing that cross my mind is actually option during upvote (50/50, 100 or no reward) to add option name Private, where you post only can be visible based to the follower part of api related to the account posting. But it's still not private photo album, it's private post.
I strongly suggest use of tablets if you are dedicated Steemian for Mobile App. It's much more easy to use and general view is better.
Best regards,
Digital Lucifer
I think it is a possibility to extend this feature, like an add-on or a separate website e.g. steemnow.com and steemdb.com
What do you think?
@yehey
Not really. For example i'm owner of the domain steemnot.com
I can (it's just example), provide a personal private file manager (like google drive but not) where you can come and create user that will have his own file/image/doc storage. To keep it for Steemians only, i can setup register form to not automatically approve user, but by admin (me) and can set the rule (same as in Steem Poker Series) that user has to be registered with the same username as steem account or it will not be approved. Once you are approved, you can have your own private images, but still they will be visible to only one you share with. So if you want your follower to see your private photos, he would be also need to have account there so you can share albums with him only. In the post in that way, here on steemit, photos would be not accessible to public, and would be loading as broken, while your follower with who you shared account on another platform can load the post with full images or directly from another website visit albums you shared with him. If someone from steem would help me to create that all through Access API and write whole bloody thing, then it would be possible to avoid registrations and login/create account directly through API, but it would be demanding another investment into the blockchain, similar to chainbb.com
Steemnow is classic web page that is just loading data from accounts through public API and it's not requesting any access from user, so it's not similar solution/example to use :)
Also big ISSUE is how to compress images and how much storage would we need (there is 220.000 users) who are uploading daily 20-500 mb, so it would BE BLEEDING EDGE storage technology and investment included.
Maybe some VIP members only ? :D
I think about developing one, but funding is holding me back.
Private albums are impossible because the platform is public? I think you're mistaken. A user could potentially post an album whose contents are encrypted. Sharing the encryption key would be the means to grant access to the album.
If each user had a public/private key pair, and published the public one as part of their account profile, the key to view the album could be encrypted with public key of each user to whom access should be granted. Those encrypted keys could be posted publicly for all to see, along with the encrypted album contents.
(I hope my ignorance of steem isn't showing and there's not some obvious technical limitation i'm missing... I'm new to steem, but in principle this seems reasonable - i mean, if you can post pictures and text, why couldn't you post encrypted pictures and text?)
Steem is not built as file manager, and sharing keys would COMPROMISE platform seriously. There is no "Reading Hash Password".
Public - Posts are meant for everyone to see. Privacy comes to each user individually not between each other in blockchain.
Or at least you should explain in more technical keys, because abrakadabra private key/post private album/share is just a magic, not a technical possibility of API yet.
Do you know what are file permissions on hosting ? How you will manage permissions with encryption if you not encrypt entire file (then it's not image anymore and requires decoding to not be encrypter (base64) which is consider serious security flaw.
Magento CMS because of it has hacks all the year and constantly needs to place some security patches/leaks.