RE: ...it is you who choose not to believe God
I don't believe in the roman catholic church and their 'god'. Even less in their 'god on earth' aka pope.
If their god really legitimizes them to provoke hell on earth, I don't care about that sick old man.
Look at jura. roman law is the basis and slaved everyone on this fucking earth.
Each country is merely a fief of the Pope. We ain't living things at the moment, cuz there has been several papal bulls named "cestui que vie", who claimed that everyone who doesn't claim to be alive is in fact dead (cuz of the Naval wars and maritime and commercial law)
So yea. The pope is not god on earth but the opposite. He is satan.
But I don't expect you to understand or even believe this. As christian, you can't believe this.
Even as freemason, it's not easy to understand.
Romans slaved my german ancestors. The roman empire never fell.
I'm with you on everything except the "satan" part. Please explain further.
If the pope is ruler over everything. And everything is a fief by the pope.
Then the pope is in fact materialistic satan.
It's all legitimized by roman law.
Vatican is completely immune in front of the law. Cuz they are the law.
What can't you follow there?
https://soundcloud.com/miki-taiki/neotericsymphony
Jesus was one of the first anarchists.
He told us fuck the authority. You don't need them. Everything you need is inside you. Fuck authority and their slave hierarchy.
Luther reminded us again. "Fuck this scam!"
But people just didnt get it. And made jesus and also luther to the new authorities, applying the same old roman law.
It's all cults around authorities. Why do you think the word cult is in culture?
https://soundcloud.com/scks-661398380/is-this-love-scks-remix
Are you a Gnostic Deist?
what?
pls specify. my first language is not english.
A Gnostic is someone who believes only in their own, personal experience.
They will not follow any person (cult of personality) or book or dogma.
A Gnostic considers themselves the "ultimate authority" (especially on spiritual and religious matters) and expects others to do the same.
no, I don't think I am that.
I think there are and were people, who are great in a specific field.
for example: einstein, tesla, nietzsche, schauberger, hayek, many to go..
but I believe everything should be voluntarily (without force or pressure), based on consens
I'm a voluntary anarchist and maybe expect others to also be
but I base all of this onto logic and not just believing.
we want a better world. work on yourself. resonate instead of dissonance.
on consens we can build real democracy and really rule as people. and also reach anarchy (no rulers - but rules on consens)
Ok, thanks for clearing that up.
Certainly there are works of famous people ("great minds") that are beacons of reason.
But you don't sound like the kind of person who would believe EVERYTHING that Einstein or Tesla or Nietzsche or Schauberger or Hyek may have said, "just-because-they-said-it".
Their "wisdom" is worth considering because of its logical-coherence, NOT simply because a particular person said it.
Voluntarism is a nice-sounding hypothesis, but without a reliable enforcement mechanism or referee, I'm not sure how scalable it might be in practice.
Ok, you seem to be using an ad-hoc, personal definition of "satan".
I guess you just mean you don't approve of the pope.
Haha
Maybe the pope is not the real pope, just a puppet in front to protect..
But the few people, who own everything and have this enormous power over everything are the manifestation of 'satan'.
God and also satan are just words. Just metaphores. Like every word.
You'll love this,