You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: OBJECTIVE MORALITY
I would say, mainly guilty until proven innocent if I were to use a single phrase as an axiom.
Are you advocating a general skepticism concerning claims?
I'd say that all claims are incoherent until proven to be coherent.
A presumption of incoherence should be maintained when evaluating claims.
I like how you are using incoherence to also mean unproven, it is basically how I process and even once I think I have something coherent I deliver it incoherent but maybe that is the nature of these things as I find them abstract.
Natural language is often ill-suited to serve epistemological concepts.