You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: My thoughts on the debate currently occurring in the Ethereum community over The DAO hack
The reason I'm opposed to forking comes from the bold claims they made before. The DAO stated explicitely that only the code counts, and any other agreement beyond that is invalid. Vitalik said the DAO has nothing to do with ETH, and it's run by private individuals on their own risk.
The "only the code counts" made me stay away from it, because I couldn't tell if it were bug free. Imo investors should learn their lesson the hard way, like most of us did at some point during our time in crypto.
Yeah, the word "immutable" was plastered all over ETH roll out so it all felt really pathetic for them to back track.
Also if meat-bags can intervene then why don't I just go to a normal real life company? Why am I doing all this stupid messing around unless this completely eliminate the gatekeepers?
Here's the terms and conditions for the creation of the DAO. They ruled out compensation for a situation like this. This is a terrible precedent if they really fork.
https://daohub.org/explainer.html
It's a great precedent, showing that the community rejects that sort of nonsensical bluster.