You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Asimov's Laws of Robotics are not good enough and why smart contracts will require human intervention

in #ethereum8 years ago (edited)

It's hard to argue with you, as you use lots of concepts, terms and examples but generally avoid addressing precise arguments. So I'll rest my case at this stage.

To summarize my approach I'll say just this: I prefer to let a thief go free with the loot than tolerate acts of irresponsibility. For me, it will not be thieves or robots which will bring our demise but the growing culture of acceptance for irresponsibility. A thief is only a thief, they are a nuance but they don't do much harm to humankind. Whereas there is nothing more dangerous than a growing population of people not willing to take responsibility for their actions.

But again, that's a philosophical stance which cannot be defended on a rational basis.

Sort:  

Behavioral data could be used to develop a model that addresses the philosophical dispute.

Retail chains already deal with the issue in determining the dynamic balance between having liberal return policies and theft.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.031
BTC 60795.60
ETH 2627.31
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.58