Ethereum Cofounder Vitalik Buterin Supports Legalization of Possessing Child Porn

in #ethereum7 years ago

Today Vitalik Buterin, cofounder of Ethereum, tweeted in support the legalisation of the possession of child pornography. His tweets, now deleted, are reproduced below.

Eth 1.jpg

Eth 2.jpg

(Original sources for the first and second pictures.)

These statements are outrageous. By legalising the possession of child pornography, it will cause demand for child porn to spike. Producers will have a greater incentive to produce even more child porn, since they can sell the porn to a wider audience. That in turn means even more children will suffer from the depredation of deviants.

Libertarianism may have its appeal, but this goes too far.

Buterin argues that by legalising the possession of child porn, it would '[establish] a general norm that "a person's laptop is an extension of their mind, and is inviolate".' This argument is nonsense: it means that the police cannot seize and examine a cracker's laptop as evidence that he committed cybercrime on it. A computer is not a sentient mind; it is merely a tool whose use reflects the user's intentions and motivations. If a person uses a computer for evil, it should be seized as evidence against him.

Even if there were social benefits from making computers untouchable, a superior option would simply be to render censorship illegal. The state would not be allowed to prosecute anyone for alleged hate speech, nor would the state be able to seize and destroy computers, films, recordings or other media containing such hate speech.

But Buterin won't take this path, because he believes in censorship.

Eth Censorship.jpg

(Original source here)

I live in a country with an actual censorship board. The Media Development Authority develops the media by censoring it. The MDA has consistently censored movies, books, plays, films, music and any other form of media that criticises the government or runs afoul of Singapore's 'Asian values', all in the name of preserving a delicate multi-racial society. My own fiction cannot be published in Singapore for fear of running afoul of the censors.

The purpose of political censorship isn't for truth and justice and order. It's to empower and entrench the ruling party. Nobody can guarantee that 'the good guys' will be in charge, only that the ones in power will use censorship as a tool to consolidate and grow their authority. It may be fine and dandy for supporters of the current regime, but once the levers of power change hands, they will find themselves on the wrong end of the censor's pen.

Cryptocurrency was supposed to uplift the world. I cannot in good faith support any cryptocurrency whose co-founder supports naked evil and blatant censorship. Effective immediately, I am dumping all my ethereum and encourage you to do the same.

--

Cheah Git San Red.jpg

To read the stories the Singapore government will disallow, you can check out the first chapter of my free serial fiction NIGHT DEMONS here and my Dragon Award nominated novel NO GODS, ONLY DAIMONS here.

Sort:  

getongab Gab: Building A Censorship-Proof P2P Protocol tweeted @ 14 Nov 2017 - 03:53 UTC

Be the founder of Ethereum:
>Believes Trumpism is “anti-freedom”
>Believes the possession of child porn does not i… twitter.com/i/web/status/9…

Disclaimer: I am just a bot trying to be helpful.

Well ain't that special... haven't seen this anywhere else yet, maybe you scooped it!

The news has been out for a day or so. No sign of it outside Twitter and at least one other post on Steemit. Wonder why...

Capital as such is not evil; it is its wrong use that is evil. Capital in some form or other will always be needed.

- Mahatma Gandhi

Wtf vitalik, this is why i sold eth his actions can dictate a market shift

Quite. Now's actually a pretty good time to start taking profits on eth.

He doesn't support shit. He merely used the analogy to make his point. Stop twisting shit.

I'm not twisting anything. Look at the tweets.

Omeid mentions that one of the team members working on Bitcoin Cash called for the legalisation of child porn. Buterin ran with it, saying that he doesn't think the legalising the possession of child porn is more radical than heroin, and claims he can make an argument that legalisation of child porn does not impose harm on others.

This is not an analogy. This is him picking up a conversational thread by someone else, justifying why he supports Bitcoin Cash by saying he doesn't think legalising child porn is bad.

And there is no way you can misconstrue his statement that 'censorship is great' is anything but a statement in support of censorship.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63237.60
ETH 2647.23
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.81