You can not argue with haters, because they do not argue with you.

It's incomplete when it comes to arguments and debates without offending haters, until whenever you will not be able to argue with haters because they are not really arguing with you.

When what you do invites "hatred" from others, then they (the haters) will attack. Of course no one likes being attacked and surely we tend to survive / defend ourselves. But it will all be in vain, because they (haters) do not hate you, they just use "your existence" as an outlet against something or maybe someone else.

For example, people who always say "life is not as easy as Mario Teguh", they instead hate Mario Teguh personally, but they just assure him that he failed because life is not that easy (Mario Teguh talk), so they might feel better . You are just an outlet or even an escape from these haters, and you will not be able to win an argument with them because from the beginning they did not argue with you.

The conclusion is first to understand whether other people really argue with you, if so then understand the basis of the argument they use, whether based on logic or feelings. If you can understand and understand who you are arguing then you can most likely win every argument, and remember not every argument "worth it" to be debated and won, in fact almost all arguments do not yield anything because ultimately people keep so why argue if it does not produce "something" in the end?