It was explained to me as a 'gnostic startle', to bridge the gap from conscious to sub conscious (like staring at a sigil during orgasm). I'll have to track down my source for all this. The above video doesn't go into depth about it.
Hmm...seems a bit odd to me. The orgasm isn't a startle but rather a slow building of energy to release. It would seem to me that this has no building of energy but that of which you create through meditation. I'm not saying its wrong, just that I don't understand it. I definitely would like to see your source info:)
A focused meditation with an intended "break" can be as powerful as the petit-morte especially from a less vital physical state. I like the simplicity of it, makes it elegant. I would elucidate in depth on why one would use a technique like this before a sexual method, but suffice it to say that I would use it "after" the orgasm.
It was explained to me as a 'gnostic startle', to bridge the gap from conscious to sub conscious (like staring at a sigil during orgasm). I'll have to track down my source for all this. The above video doesn't go into depth about it.
Hmm...seems a bit odd to me. The orgasm isn't a startle but rather a slow building of energy to release. It would seem to me that this has no building of energy but that of which you create through meditation. I'm not saying its wrong, just that I don't understand it. I definitely would like to see your source info:)
I'll track it down for everyone.
A focused meditation with an intended "break" can be as powerful as the petit-morte especially from a less vital physical state. I like the simplicity of it, makes it elegant. I would elucidate in depth on why one would use a technique like this before a sexual method, but suffice it to say that I would use it "after" the orgasm.
You said it better than I can. I'v had success with sigil bombs without sexual methods, and I enjoy this method for it's simplicity and elegance.