You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Smart Contract Platform Without Transaction Costs or the Need For 'gas' Will Finally Offer Proper Incentive To DApp Developers. An 'Ownership' Model Will Always Be More Efficient Than A 'Rental' Model In Terms Of Entitlement From Stake.
I am certain that the two will coexist. There is a place for both. EOS is not replacing ETH. ETH won't crush EOS.
EOS makes tradeoffs for speed. ETH makes many other tradeoffs.
not sure if I made the presumption or it was hinted at, of EOS being potentially like an OS for Ethereum - perhaps a standalone blockchain in itself, though if it can really deliver massive value to Ethereum developers... oh boy... :-)
That is a possibility in some ways. I feel less inclined to support exactly what you describe. EOS has uses, in the world of polychain apps it might see a lot of adoption.
Still ETH can do a lot of the features being touted as EOS's selling points. EOS makes heavy tradeoffs to achieve its goals.
https://steemit.com/ethereum/@kyle.anderson/eth-obsolescence-how-the-metropolis-hardfork-allows-important-extensions-to-the-ethereum-protocol-no-transaction-fees